Valić F, Zuskin E
Br J Ind Med. 1971 Oct;28(4):364-8. doi: 10.1136/oem.28.4.364.
364-368. To compare the effect of cotton and jute dust, respiratory symptoms were studied and respiratory function measured in 60 cotton and 91 jute non-smoking female workers of similar age distribution, similar length of exposure to dust, and exposed to similar respirable airborne dust concentrations. Cotton workers had a significantly higher prevalence of byssinosis, of persistent cough, and of dyspnoea (P < 0·01) than jute workers. Among cotton workers 28·3% were found to have characteristic symptoms of byssinosis, whereas none was found among jute workers. Exposure to cotton but also to jute dust caused significant reductions of FEV, FVC, and PEF (P < 0·01) over the first working shift in the week. Functional grading of jute and cotton dust effects has shown that about 30% of cotton workers had functional grades F1 and F2, while only 13% of jute workers were found in the same grades (F1). It is concluded that cotton dust may be considered more active than jute though the latter cannot be considered inactive.
364 - 368。为比较棉尘和麻尘的影响,对年龄分布相似、接触粉尘时长相似且接触可吸入空气传播粉尘浓度相似的60名棉纺织非吸烟女工和91名黄麻纺织非吸烟女工进行了呼吸道症状研究和呼吸功能测量。棉纺织工人患棉尘肺、持续性咳嗽和呼吸困难的患病率显著高于黄麻纺织工人(P < 0·01)。在棉纺织工人中,发现28·3%有棉尘肺的典型症状,而黄麻纺织工人中未发现。在一周的第一个工作日班次中,接触棉尘以及麻尘均导致第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV)、用力肺活量(FVC)和呼气峰值流速(PEF)显著降低(P < 0·01)。对麻尘和棉尘影响的功能分级显示,约30%的棉纺织工人功能分级为F1和F2,而只有13%的黄麻纺织工人处于相同分级(F1)。得出的结论是,虽然不能认为麻尘无活性,但棉尘可能比麻尘更具活性。