• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与课堂和临床样本中综合利手性相关的优势眼优势

Sighting-eye dominance related to composite sidedness in classroom and clinic samples.

作者信息

Palmer L L

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 1979 Oct;49(2):551-4. doi: 10.2466/pms.1979.49.2.551.

DOI:10.2466/pms.1979.49.2.551
PMID:514773
Abstract

Near-point and far-point binocular and monocular sighting tests given 20 high and 20 low achievers each from regular classrooms at Grades 4, 8, and 12 (N = 240) yielded significant chi 2 for differences of proportions of lateral agreement with sidedness in comparison to distributions unrelated to sidedness. Composite sighting congruent to sidedness yielded significant differences between classroom and reading clinic samples. The near-point binocular sighting test markedly influences distributions of combined scores in sighting.

摘要

对来自4年级、8年级和12年级普通班级的20名高成就者和20名低成就者(N = 240)进行近点和远点双眼及单眼视力测试,结果显示,与非偏好侧分布相比,在偏好侧的横向一致性比例差异方面,卡方检验具有显著意义。与偏好侧一致的综合视力测试结果在课堂样本和阅读诊所样本之间存在显著差异。近点双眼视力测试对视力综合得分的分布有显著影响。

相似文献

1
Sighting-eye dominance related to composite sidedness in classroom and clinic samples.与课堂和临床样本中综合利手性相关的优势眼优势
Percept Mot Skills. 1979 Oct;49(2):551-4. doi: 10.2466/pms.1979.49.2.551.
2
Characteristics of near-point and far-point binocular and monocular sighting in classroom and ophthalmological populations.教室人群和眼科人群中近点和远点双眼及单眼视力的特征。
Percept Mot Skills. 1977 Dec;45(3 Pt 1):707-11. doi: 10.2466/pms.1977.45.3.707.
3
Correlations of sighting-eye dominance tests and comparison of combined scores in classroom, clinic, and ophthalmological populations.注视眼优势测试的相关性以及课堂、诊所和眼科人群综合得分的比较。
Percept Mot Skills. 1977 Dec;45(3 Pt 2):1259-63. doi: 10.2466/pms.1977.45.3f.1259.
4
Ear dominance in classroom and clinic samples.课堂样本和临床样本中的耳优势。
Percept Mot Skills. 1981 Jun;52(3):777-8. doi: 10.2466/pms.1981.52.3.777.
5
Looking at eye dominance from a different angle: is sighting strength related to hand preference?从不同角度看主导眼:瞄准力与手偏好有关吗?
Cortex. 2013 Oct;49(9):2542-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.11.011. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
6
DOES DYSLEXIA DEVELOP FROM LEFT-EYE DOMINANCE?阅读障碍是由左眼优势发展而来的吗?
Percept Mot Skills. 2015 Oct;121(2):569-601. doi: 10.2466/15.10.PMS.121c21x5. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
7
Relationship between perceptual stability, and sighting dominance.知觉稳定性与注视优势之间的关系。
Percept Mot Skills. 1980 Aug;51(1):263-6. doi: 10.2466/pms.1980.51.1.263.
8
Monocular asymmetries in visual latency as a function of sighting dominance.作为注视优势函数的视觉潜伏期单眼不对称性。
Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1982 Dec;59(12):987-90. doi: 10.1097/00006324-198212000-00009.
9
Cognitive style and dichotic asymmetries of disabled readers.阅读障碍者的认知风格与双耳不对称性
Cortex. 1982 Oct;18(3):357-66. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(82)80034-8.
10
Cognitive profile of adolescents with math disabilities: are the profiles different from those with reading disabilities?数学障碍青少年的认知特征:与阅读障碍者的特征有何不同?
Child Neuropsychol. 2012;18(2):125-43. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2011.589377. Epub 2011 Oct 3.