Naish P J, Chambers R E, Cooke M
Ann Clin Biochem. 1979 Sep;16(5):254-8. doi: 10.1177/000456327901600165.
A comparative evaluation of a gas-liquid chromatographic (GLC) assay and a high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) assay for the determination of plasma theophylline levels has been carried out. Both methods are reliable, accurate, and technically simple and appear to be specific for theophylline. The HPLC system is more sensitive (sample volume 25 micrliter) than the GLC system (sample volume 500 microliter) and is therefore suitable for the estimation of theophylline in microsamples. The HPLC system also has better precision (coefficient of variation: within-batch 2.0%, between-batch 3.0%) than the GLC system (coefficient of variation: within-batch 3.5%, between-batch 5.6%). Good correlation (r=0.964) was found between plasma theophylline levels (n=75, observed range 4-186 mumol/l) determined by each procedure. The results of this study indicate that, of the two systems investigated, HPLC is the method of choice.
已对用于测定血浆茶碱水平的气相色谱(GLC)分析法和高效液相色谱(HPLC)分析法进行了比较评估。两种方法都可靠、准确且技术操作简单,并且似乎对茶碱具有特异性。HPLC系统(进样量25微升)比GLC系统(进样量500微升)更灵敏,因此适用于微量样品中茶碱的测定。HPLC系统的精密度也比GLC系统更好(变异系数:批内2.0%,批间3.0%),而GLC系统的变异系数为批内3.5%,批间5.6%。通过每种方法测定的血浆茶碱水平(n = 75,观察范围4 - 186微摩尔/升)之间发现有良好的相关性(r = 0.964)。本研究结果表明,在所研究的两种系统中,HPLC是首选方法。