Knox F S, Wachtel T L, McCahan G R
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1979 Oct;50(10):1023-30.
The United States Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory (USAARL) porcine cutaneous bioassay technique was used to determine what mitigating effect four thermally protective flight suit fabrics would have on fire-induced skin damage. The fabrics were 4.8-ox twill weave Nomex aramide, 4.5-oz stabilized twill weave polybenzimidazole, 4.8-oz plain weave experimental high-temperature polymer (HT4), and 4.8-oz plain weave Nomex aramide (New Weave Nomex or NWN). Each fabric sample was assayed 20 times in each of four configurations: as a single layer in contact with the skin; as a single layer with a 6.35 mm (0.25 in) air gap between fabric and skin; in conjuction with a cotton T-shirt with no air gaps; and, finally, in conjuction with a T-shirt with a 6.35 mm air gap between T-shirt and fabric. Bare skin was used as a control. A JP-4 fueled furnace was used as a thermal source and was adjested to deliver a mean heat flux of 3.07 cal/cm2/s. The duration of exposure was 5 s. Four hundred burn sites were graded using clinical observation and microscopic techniques. Used as single layers, none of the fabrics demonstrated superiority in providing clinically significant protection. When used with a cotton T-shirt, protection was improved. Protection improved progressively for all fabrics and configuration when an air gap was introduced. The experimental high-temperature polymer consistently demonstrated lower heat flux transmission in all configurations, but did not significantly reduce clinical burns.
美国陆军航空医学研究实验室(USAARL)的猪皮肤生物测定技术被用于确定四种热防护飞行服面料对火灾引起的皮肤损伤有何种缓解作用。这些面料分别是4.8盎司斜纹编织的Nomex芳纶、4.5盎司稳定斜纹编织的聚苯并咪唑、4.8盎司平纹编织的实验性高温聚合物(HT4)以及4.8盎司平纹编织的Nomex芳纶(新编织Nomex或NWN)。每个面料样本在四种配置下各进行了20次测定:作为与皮肤接触的单层;作为在面料与皮肤之间有6.35毫米(0.25英寸)气隙的单层;与无气隙的棉质T恤搭配使用;最后,与在T恤和面料之间有6.35毫米气隙的T恤搭配使用。裸露的皮肤用作对照。使用一台以JP - 4为燃料的熔炉作为热源,并调整使其提供3.07卡/平方厘米/秒的平均热通量。暴露持续时间为5秒。使用临床观察和显微镜技术对400个烧伤部位进行了分级。作为单层使用时,没有一种面料在提供具有临床意义的防护方面表现出优势。与棉质T恤搭配使用时,防护效果有所改善。当引入气隙时,所有面料和配置的防护效果都逐渐提高。实验性高温聚合物在所有配置中始终表现出较低的热通量传递,但并未显著减少临床烧伤。