Carey W B, McDevitt S C, Baker D
Dev Med Child Neurol. 1979 Dec;21(6):765-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1979.tb01699.x.
After referral to a pediatric neurologist for problems in behavior and learning, 61 children aged from three to seven years were assigned to one of four diagnostic groups: (1) minimal brain dysfunction (MBD); (2) hyperactivity; (3) learning disability; and (4) other criteria. Their temperament profiles were determined by the Behavioral Style Questionnaire. The disproportionately large number of children with more difficult temperament diagnoses in the referred population indicates that teachers and physicians may have mininterpreted a less adaptive behavioral style as evidence of neurological dysfunction. Those diagnosed clinically as having MBD were less adaptable, less persistent, more active and more negative than the control population. This suggests that MBD overlaps with difficult temperament. Children in the other three groups were temperamentally similar to the MBD group, which raises doubt about the advisability of diagnosing MBD on the basis of behavior alone. A comprehensive neurobehavioral profile is necessary to separate clearly the various factors contributing to problems in school performance.
在因行为和学习问题被转介给儿科神经科医生后,61名年龄在3至7岁的儿童被分为四个诊断组之一:(1) 轻微脑功能障碍 (MBD);(2) 多动;(3) 学习障碍;以及 (4) 其他标准。他们的气质特征由行为风格问卷确定。在被转介的人群中,气质诊断较困难的儿童数量过多,这表明教师和医生可能将适应性较差的行为风格误判为神经功能障碍的证据。临床诊断为患有MBD的儿童比对照组儿童适应性更差、坚持性更差、更活跃且更消极。这表明MBD与困难气质重叠。其他三组的儿童在气质上与MBD组相似,这引发了仅根据行为诊断MBD是否明智的疑问。需要全面的神经行为特征来清楚地区分导致学业成绩问题的各种因素。