• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[诊断及住院时长对首次精神病理学测试(AMP系统)结果复测信度的影响]

[Influence of diagnosis and length of hospitalization on the retest reliability for findings of the first psychopathological test (AMP system)].

作者信息

Woggon B

出版信息

Int Pharmacopsychiatry. 1979;14(4):228-42.

PMID:521245
Abstract

80 inpatients were interviewed twice by the same physician with an interval of 24 h. By forming subgroups concerning diagnosis and duration of hospitalization, it was possible to examine the influence of these two criteria on the retest reliability of the following findings: (1) aspects of the interview; (2) AMP symptoms; (3) AMP syndromes; (4) clinical syndrome diagnoses, and (5) nosological diagnoses. The duration of hospitalization (up to 40 days) had no influence on the retest reliability of the described findings. The diagnosis (schizophrenia/depression) had no influence on the well-structured findings (AMP symptoms, AMP syndromes). On the contrary, the diagnosis influenced findings which are not so well structured and defined (aspects of the interview, clinical syndrome diagnoses, nosological diagnoses).

摘要

80名住院患者由同一位医生进行了两次访谈,间隔时间为24小时。通过根据诊断和住院时间形成亚组,得以检验这两个标准对以下结果的重测信度的影响:(1)访谈的各个方面;(2)AMP症状;(3)AMP综合征;(4)临床综合征诊断,以及(5)疾病分类诊断。住院时间(最长40天)对所述结果的重测信度没有影响。诊断(精神分裂症/抑郁症)对结构良好的结果(AMP症状、AMP综合征)没有影响。相反,诊断对结构和定义不那么明确的结果(访谈的各个方面、临床综合征诊断、疾病分类诊断)有影响。

相似文献

1
[Influence of diagnosis and length of hospitalization on the retest reliability for findings of the first psychopathological test (AMP system)].[诊断及住院时长对首次精神病理学测试(AMP系统)结果复测信度的影响]
Int Pharmacopsychiatry. 1979;14(4):228-42.
2
[Examination of the retest reliability of the findings of the first psychopathological examination (AMP system)].[首次精神病理学检查(AMP系统)结果的复测信度检验]
Int Pharmacopsychiatry. 1979;14(5):245-59.
3
The diagnoses of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder and unipolar depression: interrater reliability and congruence between DSM-IV and ICD-10.精神分裂症、分裂情感性障碍、双相情感障碍及单相抑郁症的诊断:评定者间信度以及《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)与《国际疾病分类》第十版(ICD-10)之间的一致性
Psychopathology. 2009;42(5):293-8. doi: 10.1159/000228838. Epub 2009 Jul 16.
4
A new rating scale for negative symptoms: the Motor-Affective-Social Scale.一种用于阴性症状的新评定量表:运动-情感-社交量表。
Psychiatry Res. 2008 Sep 30;160(3):346-55. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2007.06.021. Epub 2008 Aug 22.
5
[Delusional psychoses during first hospitalization: age of onset and diagnosis of schizophrenia by six diagnostic criteria].首次住院期间的妄想性精神病:发病年龄及根据六种诊断标准对精神分裂症的诊断
Psychiatr Pol. 1993 Jul-Aug;27(4):385-99.
6
Diagnostic reassessment and treatment response in schizophrenia.精神分裂症的诊断重新评估与治疗反应
J Clin Psychiatry. 1994 Dec;55(12):528-32.
7
[Clinical assessment of schizophrenic syndromes (CASS): rationale, construction, reliability and sensitivity evaluation, and an attempt at normalization of the new diagnostic tool].[精神分裂症综合征的临床评估(CASS):新诊断工具的基本原理、构建、信度和敏感性评估以及标准化尝试]
Psychiatr Pol. 2000 Mar-Apr;34(2):179-201.
8
Diagnosis of severely ill inpatients in China. A collaborative project using the structured clinical interview for DSM-III (SCID).中国重症住院患者的诊断。一项使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版结构化临床访谈(SCID)的合作项目。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1988 Oct;176(10):585-92.
9
Comparison of clinical and best-estimate research DSM-IV diagnoses in a Finnish sample of first-admission psychosis and severe affective disorder.芬兰首次入院的精神病和重度情感障碍样本中临床诊断与最佳估计研究性DSM-IV诊断的比较。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2001;55(2):107-11. doi: 10.1080/08039480151108507.
10
The reliability and validity of general psychotic rating scales with people with mild and moderate intellectual disabilities: an empirical investigation.一般精神病评定量表在轻度和中度智力残疾人群中的信效度:一项实证研究。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2005 Jul;49(Pt 7):490-500. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00696.x.