Suppr超能文献

对Haemonetics 30型设备制备的血小板与多单位袋式血小板采集法所制备的血小板进行的比较。

A comparison of platelets prepared by the Haemonetics Model 30 and multiunit bag plateletpheresis.

作者信息

Daly P A, Schiffer C A, Aisner J, Wiernik P H

出版信息

Transfusion. 1979 Nov-Dec;19(6):778-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1979.19680104109.x.

Abstract

Platelet concentrates were prepared using the Haemonetics Model 30 (M-30) and a multiunit bag pheresis method. Comparisons of collection efficiency using paired donor collections and posttransfusion recovery using the same donor-recipient pairs were made for the two methods. The M-30 proved consistently superior as a method of collection in terms of efficiency and yield per hour (p less than .001). When the platelets obtained were transfused to HL-A matched, clinically stable, thrombocytopenic patients with acute leukemia similar increments within the expected range were obtained at 1 hour and 18 hours posttransfusion. While the M-30 is a more efficient collection method, the bag method is still relatively efficient and may be more suitable for smaller centers and specialized uses.

摘要

使用Haemonetics Model 30(M - 30)和多单位袋式采血法制备血小板浓缩物。对这两种方法进行了比较,采用配对供体采集来比较采集效率,并使用相同的供体 - 受体对来比较输血后回收率。就每小时的效率和产量而言,M - 30作为一种采集方法始终表现更优(p小于0.001)。当将所获得的血小板输注给HL - A匹配、临床稳定的急性白血病血小板减少患者时,在输血后1小时和18小时获得了预期范围内的类似增量。虽然M - 30是一种更高效的采集方法,但袋式采血法仍然相对高效,可能更适合较小的中心和特殊用途。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验