Suppr超能文献

Progestasert TM宫内节育器和Gravigard宫内节育器对痛经影响的比较研究。

A comparative study of the effect of the Progestasert TM and Gravigard IUDs on dysmenorrhoea.

作者信息

Pizarro E, Gomez-Rogers C, Rowe P J

出版信息

Contraception. 1979 Nov;20(5):455-66. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(79)90051-9.

Abstract

Data obtained from questionnaires on the occurrence of dysmenorrhoea in women using IUDs inserted randomly (146 of them Progestasert and 149 Copper 7) are analyzed. In both groups a reduction in the intensity of menstrual cramps was observed over 12 months of use. Although these reductions are significant in each group, they are slightly higher in Progestasert users. However, on comparing the reduction tendencies of both groups, the difference between them is not significant. No significant differences become apparent either when comparing premenstrual and intermenstrual camps. The usefulness of simple questionnaires directed at detecting the nature of pain in currently used family planning forms for IUD users is discussed.

摘要

对通过问卷调查获得的数据进行了分析,这些问卷涉及随机插入宫内节育器(IUD)的女性痛经发生情况(其中146人使用孕酮节育器,149人使用铜7节育器)。在两组中,使用12个月后均观察到经痛强度有所降低。虽然每组的这些降低都很显著,但孕酮节育器使用者的降低幅度略高。然而,比较两组的降低趋势时,它们之间的差异并不显著。比较经前和经间疼痛时,也没有明显的显著差异。讨论了针对检测IUD使用者当前计划生育形式中疼痛性质的简单问卷的实用性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验