[X 线头影测量结果有多准确？一项关于使用 ANB 角确定咬合关系的研究] - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

[How exact are radiographic cephalometric findings? A study on the determination of the occlusion using the ANB angle].

作者信息

Schmuth G P, Altuna G

出版信息

Osterr Z Stomatol. 1971 Sep-Oct;68(9):370-81.

PMID:5289356

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

[How exact are radiographic cephalometric findings? A study on the determination of the occlusion using the ANB angle].[X 线头影测量结果有多准确？一项关于使用 ANB 角确定咬合关系的研究]

Osterr Z Stomatol. 1971 Sep-Oct;68(9):370-81.

[Saggittal occlusion anomalies and false bite positions from the radiographic and cephalometric viewpoint].[从放射学和头影测量学角度看矢状位咬合异常与假性咬合位置]

Zahnarztl Welt Zahnarztl Rundsch ZWR Zahnarztl Reform. 1966 Oct 10;67(19):683-8 concl.

[X-ray cephalometric characteristic of face soft tissue profile in orthognatic bite].正颌咬合下面部软组织侧貌的X线头影测量特征

Stomatologiia (Mosk). 2007;86(4):67-70.

Evaluation of the Bergen cephalometric norms: a radiological and statistical appraisal.卑尔根头影测量标准的评估：放射学与统计学评价

Br J Orthod. 1987 Apr;14(2):95-100. doi: 10.1179/bjo.14.2.95.

[Diagnosis of cases of malocclusion of Angle class 3 in the deciduous dentition by means of profile photographs and cephalometric analysis limited to essential points (profile examination; relations of the front teeth to their jaw bases; analysis of the mandible)].通过侧面照片和限于要点的头影测量分析（侧面检查；前牙与其颌骨基部的关系；下颌骨分析）诊断乳牙列安氏Ⅲ类错牙合病例

Riv Ital Stomatol. 1970 Apr;25(4):329-56.

[Clinico-radiographic evaluation of relations between the spinal curve and malocclusion].[脊柱侧弯与错牙合畸形关系的临床影像学评估]

Mondo Ortod. 1990 Jul-Aug;15(4):413-8.

Discrimination between normal and class II individuals using Steiner's analysis.使用施泰纳分析法区分正常个体和二类个体。

Angle Orthod. 1972 Jul;42(3):212-20. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1972)042<0212:DBNACI>2.0.CO;2.

[The cephalometric characteristics of the base of the skull in bite anomalies in the sagittal plane].[矢状面咬合异常时颅骨基底的头影测量特征]

Stomatologiia (Mosk). 1995;74(5):52-4.

A cephalometric comparison between class II, division 2 malocclusion and normal occlusion.安氏II类2分类错牙合与正常牙合的头影测量比较。

Angle Orthod. 1974 Jul;44(3):262-7. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1974)044<0262:ACCBCI>2.0.CO;2.

Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks and errors of measurements of cephalometric cranial distances.头影测量标志点的可重复性及头影测量颅骨距离测量误差

Angle Orthod. 1974 Jan;44(1):56-61. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1974)044<0056:ROCLAE>2.0.CO;2.

引用本文的文献

[Dentoalveolar adaptation in vertical jaw-base discrepancies].[垂直颌骨基底差异中的牙槽适应]

Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1993 Feb;54(1):10-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02168014.

[What significance do cephalometric measurements on radiographs of the profile have for reconstructive dentistry in adults?].[成人头颅侧位片的头影测量对口腔重建治疗有何意义？]

Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1983 Jun;44(3):225-42. doi: 10.1007/BF01999724.

[A method for 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis].[一种三维头影测量分析方法]

Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1983 Jun;44(3):217-24. doi: 10.1007/BF01999723.

[Effects of activators in class II division 1 therapy].[激活剂在安氏II类1分类错牙合治疗中的作用]

Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1987 Feb;48(1):41-51. doi: 10.1007/BF02167247.

[Comparative study of the accuracy of localizing cephalometric reference points in using digital and conventional imaging technique].[数字成像技术与传统成像技术在头影测量参考点定位准确性的比较研究]

Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1991 Oct;52(5):289-96. doi: 10.1007/BF02166729.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验