Kirsner K, Sang D L
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1979 May;5(2):260-76. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.5.2.260.
Four experiments were conducted to examine temporal changes in visual and name codes and the relationship between them. Unlike earlier studies, the design included (a) several levels of visual similarity in addition to the conventional same case and different case conditions and (b) physical- as well as name-match tasks to provide direct evidence about subjects' retention of form information. The main results were as follows: First, the presence of multiple typefonts in the stimulus set does not eliminate convergence between the reaction time functions for the physical- and name-match conditions in a name-match task. Second, inclusion of a physical-match task, requiring subjects to retain form information, does not necessarily eliminate convergence in a primary, name-match task. When the secondary task does reduce convergence, however, the results suggest that it does this through its effect on the name-match function rather than on the physical-match function. Third, apart from difficulties with within-cluster typefont combinations, particularly at long interstimulus intervals, subjects can generally retain and use reliable information about letter form over the ISI range (.5--4.0 sec) used in the experiments. The results were thought to be consistent with the conclusion that convergence results from a combination of (a) a nonoptional decrease in the accessibility of the visual code as a function of increasing ISI and (b) an optional increase in the accessibility of the name code. Under ISI conditions at least, convergence cannot be attributed to either generation of a visual code of the alternative form of the target letter or to the absence of relevant form information.
进行了四项实验来检验视觉代码和名称代码的时间变化及其之间的关系。与早期研究不同,该设计包括:(a) 除了传统的大小写相同和不同的条件外,还有几个视觉相似性水平;(b) 物理匹配任务和名称匹配任务,以提供关于受试者对形式信息保留情况的直接证据。主要结果如下:第一,刺激集中多种字体的存在并没有消除名称匹配任务中物理匹配条件和名称匹配条件的反应时函数之间的趋同。第二,纳入要求受试者保留形式信息的物理匹配任务,并不一定会消除主要的名称匹配任务中的趋同。然而,当次要任务确实减少趋同时,结果表明它是通过对名称匹配函数的影响而不是对物理匹配函数的影响来做到这一点的。第三,除了簇内字体组合存在困难,特别是在较长的刺激间隔时,在实验中使用的ISI范围(0.5 - 4.0秒)内,受试者通常能够保留并使用关于字母形式的可靠信息。这些结果被认为与以下结论一致:趋同是由以下因素共同作用导致的:(a) 随着ISI增加,视觉代码的可及性非选择性地降低;(b) 名称代码的可及性选择性地增加。至少在ISI条件下,趋同不能归因于目标字母替代形式的视觉代码的生成,也不能归因于相关形式信息的缺失。