Collier L H, Lightman E
J Hyg (Lond). 1971 Dec;69(4):717-25. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400021987.
Trachoma vaccines are usually assayed by testing their ability to protect monkeys or baboons against subsequent challenge of the conjunctiva with a pathogenic strain of trachoma/inclusion conjunctivitis (TRIC) agent. In such experiments the course of infection in vaccinated baboons was compared in terms of arbitrary scores assigned to a range of clinical signs, and of counts of TRIC inclusions in conjunctival scrapings. Analysis of many such scores indicated that after a large challenge dose of strain MRC-4s, the scores for signs of inflammation reached their maximum earlier than the follicle score; the inflammation score was closely related to the number of inclusions, whereas the follicle score was not. With this system, the optimum periods for eliciting differences between vaccinated and control measures varied according to the sign used; it was later for follicles than for inflammation or inclusions. For assessing the influence of vaccination, the mean of the inflammation scores read weekly for the first 3 weeks after challenge and the mean inclusion score over the same period were equally satisfactory, and either was rather better than the mean of three follicle scores taken over the period 3-6 weeks.For assessing the influence of vaccines or therapeutic agents on experimental trachoma it is important to determine which signs discriminate best between treated and control animals, and the optimum times for measuring them.
沙眼疫苗通常通过测试其保护猴子或狒狒免受沙眼/包涵体结膜炎(TRIC)病原体致病菌株后续结膜攻击的能力来进行测定。在这类实验中,对接种疫苗的狒狒的感染过程,根据赋予一系列临床体征的任意评分以及结膜刮片中TRIC包涵体的计数进行比较。对许多这样的评分进行分析表明,在大剂量接种MRC - 4s菌株后,炎症体征评分比滤泡评分更早达到最大值;炎症评分与包涵体数量密切相关,而滤泡评分则不然。在这个系统中,引发接种组和对照组差异的最佳时期因所使用的体征而异;滤泡的最佳时期比炎症或包涵体的要晚。为了评估疫苗接种的影响,在攻击后前3周每周读取的炎症评分均值以及同一时期的包涵体评分均值同样令人满意,并且二者都比在第3至6周期间获取的三个滤泡评分均值要好一些。为了评估疫苗或治疗剂对实验性沙眼的影响,确定哪些体征能最有效地鉴别治疗组和对照组动物以及测量它们的最佳时间很重要。