Assaad F A, Maxwell-Lyons F, Sundaresan T
Bull World Health Organ. 1969;41(2):181-94.
A trachoma prevalence survey was conducted in 1960-61 in Taiwan prior to the introduction of a large-scale treatment campaign. Marked local differences in endemicity of trachoma were encountered in neighbouring administrative areas (lin). Use is made of these local variations in depicting the interactions between socio-economical factors and endemicity of the disease.The study demonstrates the interaction between the socio-economic development of the household, on the one hand, and of the community of which the household forms a part, on the other. In a community of low trachoma endemicity, persons who do not share in the general socio-economic level of development nevertheless benefit from a low risk of infection, while in a community of high endemicity those in the upper socio-economic groups suffer from an enhanced risk of infection, though to an appreciably lesser extent than the general average for the community.The study indicates a possibility of an absence of association between various bio-physical environmental factors; for example, in a small community, better housing does not necessarily mean a better water supply. However, if any of the factors are considered, whether there is an implied pattern in the other factors or not, the most striking index of relative prevalence appears to be provided by the number of persons per unit (i.e., ping; about 3.3 m(2)) of sleeping area.
1960 - 1961年,在台湾开展大规模沙眼治疗运动之前进行了一次沙眼患病率调查。在相邻行政区(乡)发现沙眼流行程度存在明显的地区差异。利用这些地区差异来描述社会经济因素与该疾病流行程度之间的相互作用。该研究表明,一方面是家庭的社会经济发展,另一方面是家庭所属社区的社会经济发展之间的相互作用。在沙眼流行程度低的社区,那些未达到总体社会经济发展水平的人仍能受益于低感染风险;而在流行程度高的社区,社会经济地位较高的群体感染风险增加,不过比社区总体平均水平增加的程度要小得多。该研究表明,各种生物物理环境因素之间可能不存在关联;例如,在一个小社区,住房条件较好并不一定意味着供水更好。然而,无论考虑其中任何一个因素,无论其他因素是否存在隐含模式,相对患病率最显著的指标似乎是每单位(即坪;约3.3平方米)睡眠面积的人数。