Newell K W
Bull World Health Organ. 1966;34(6):827-57.
While leprosy has been studied exhaustively by leprologists, it is only recently that persons in other disciplines have given this disease the attention it deserves. Various methods for its prevention and control are now being advocated and tested in the field, and it appears reasonable for an epidemiologist to review the bases of current theories and to examine the evidence for existing hypotheses. This has been done by a review of some of the more recent literature. The conclusion is reached that the anergic, or factor N, hypothesis that has been evolved to relate the lepromin test to the findings in clinical leprosy appears to be the most promising, and that, if this hypothesis can be substantiated, it is unlikely that BCG vaccination can be a very useful tool for prevention. Many possibilities exist for epidemiological and laboratory research into this disease, which in many ways appears to be unique.
虽然麻风病学家对麻风病进行了详尽的研究,但直到最近其他学科的人员才给予这种疾病应有的关注。目前在实地倡导并测试了各种预防和控制方法,对于一名流行病学家来说,回顾当前理论的基础并审视现有假设的证据似乎是合理的。这已通过对一些最新文献的综述得以完成。得出的结论是,为将麻风菌素试验与临床麻风病的发现联系起来而提出的无反应性或N因子假说似乎最具前景,而且,如果这一假说能够得到证实,卡介苗接种不太可能成为一种非常有用的预防工具。对这种在许多方面似乎都很独特的疾病进行流行病学和实验室研究存在诸多可能性。