Suppr超能文献

管理委员会及管理人员对社区心理健康中心公民参与的态度。

Governing board and management staff attitudes toward community mental health center citizen participation.

作者信息

Pinto R, Fiester A

出版信息

Community Ment Health J. 1979 Winter;15(4):259-66. doi: 10.1007/BF00778705.

Abstract

The present study investigated the attitudes and values of community and mental health center board and management staff of four Community Mental Health Centers and one mental health clinic toward the recent federal mandate calling for increased citizen involvement in center evaluation activities. Three related areas were address: (a) general attitudes toward citizen participation, (b) types of program-evaluation activities in which citizen input would be most useful; and (c) types of individuals who would best serve on citizen review groups. The results indicated that although board members are somewhat more optimistic about benefits received from citizen involvement, overall there was close agreement between the board and staff respondents in the three areas studied. These results were interpreted as substantiating the view that community mental health center boards typically reflect a provider orientation in their approach to mental health governance. A missing evaluation component in most centers is citizen participation as it reflects the values of its service consumers. It is advocated that only by developing consumer participation mechanisms will centers more readily achieve the goal of responsiveness to community needs.

摘要

本研究调查了四个社区心理健康中心和一个心理健康诊所的社区及心理健康中心董事会成员与管理人员,对近期要求增加公民参与中心评估活动的联邦指令的态度和价值观。研究涉及三个相关领域:(a)对公民参与的总体态度;(b)公民意见最有用的项目评估活动类型;(c)最适合在公民审查小组任职的人员类型。结果表明,尽管董事会成员对公民参与带来的益处更为乐观,但在所研究的三个领域中,董事会和员工受访者总体上意见相近。这些结果被解释为证实了这样一种观点,即社区心理健康中心董事会在心理健康治理方法上通常体现出提供者导向。大多数中心缺少的评估要素是公民参与,因为这反映了其服务对象的价值观。有人主张,只有建立消费者参与机制,各中心才能更轻松地实现响应社区需求的目标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验