Uzzell B P, Zimmerman R A, Dolinskas C A, Obrist W D
Cortex. 1979 Sep;15(3):391-401. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(79)80066-0.
Twenty-six adult patients with CT scans were given the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) during recovery from an acute head injury. Focal lesions were observed on the initial CT scans of 24 patients. These included 13 in the right hemisphere, 8 in the left hemisphere and 3 in both hemispheres. Diffuse cerebral swelling was observed in the remaining 2 patients. Both the standard WAIS examination (11 subtests) and a shorter version described by McFie (7 subtests) were used to assess psychological impairment associated with CT documented lesions. The McFie method involved a special scoring procedure that utilized reference subtests as an index of premorbid functioning. When mean algebraic differences between Verbal and Performance subtests were used, both methods differentiated left and right-sided lesions to a highly significant degree (p less than .001). Lateralized lesions yielded significant differences on 3 individual subtests (1 Verbal and 2 Performance) with the McFie method and on 6 individual subtests (all Verbal) with the standard WAIS procedure. Wechsler's Deterioration Quotient did not discriminate between groups. It was concluded that the traditional distinction between Verbal and Performance subtests on the WAIS was valid for CT documented lesions, and the shorter McFie version was as effective as the standard WAIS in lateralizing psychological dysfunction. Acknowledgements. This research was supported by Contract NS 5-2316 and Grant NS 08803 from the National Institutes of Health. We are grateful to Drs. Thomas A. Gennarelli and Howard I. Hurtig for patient referrals and neurological evaluations.
26名成年患者在急性头部损伤恢复期间接受了CT扫描,并进行了韦氏成人智力量表(WAIS)测试。24名患者的初始CT扫描显示有局灶性病变。其中13例位于右半球,8例位于左半球,3例双侧半球均有病变。其余2例患者观察到弥漫性脑肿胀。标准的WAIS检查(11个分测验)和McFie描述的较短版本(7个分测验)均用于评估与CT记录病变相关的心理损伤。McFie方法涉及一种特殊的评分程序,该程序利用参考分测验作为病前功能的指标。当使用言语和操作分测验的平均代数差异时,两种方法都能高度显著地区分左侧和右侧病变(p小于0.001)。对于侧化病变,McFie方法在3个单独的分测验(1个言语和2个操作)上产生了显著差异,而标准WAIS程序在6个单独的分测验(均为言语)上产生了显著差异。韦氏衰退商数在不同组之间没有区分能力。得出的结论是,WAIS上言语和操作分测验的传统区分对于CT记录的病变是有效的,并且较短的McFie版本在定位心理功能障碍方面与标准WAIS一样有效。致谢。本研究得到了美国国立卫生研究院合同NS 5 - 2316和资助NS 08803的支持。我们感谢Thomas A. Gennarelli博士和Howard I. Hurtig博士提供患者转诊和神经学评估。