Santhanam C J, Lunt R R, Johnson S L, Cooper C B, Thayer P S, Jones J W
Environ Health Perspect. 1979 Dec;33:131-57. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7933131.
This paper focuses on the incremental impacts of coal ash and flue gas desulfurization (FGD) wastes associated with increased coal usage by utilities and industry under the National Energy Plan (NEP). In the paper, 1985 and 2000 are the assessment points using the baseline data taken from the Annual Environmental Analysis Report (AEAR, September 1977). In each EPA region, the potential mix of disposal options has been broadly estimated and impacts assessed therefrom. In addition, future use of advanced combustion techniques has been taken into account. The quantities of coal ash and FGD wastes depend on ash and sulfur content of the coal, emission regulations, the types of ash collection and FGD systems, and operating conditions of the systems and boiler. The disposal of these wastes is (or will be) subject to Federal and State regulations. The one key legal framework concerning environmental impact on land is the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). RCRA and related Federal and State laws provide a sufficient statutory basis for preventing significant adverse health and environmental impacts from coal ash and FGD waste disposal. However, much of the development and implementation of specific regulations lie ahead. FGD wastes and coal ash and FGD wastes are currently disposed of exclusively on land. The most common land disposal methods are inpoundments (ponds) and landfills, although some mine disposal is also practiced. The potential environmental impacts of this disposal are dependent on the characteristics of the disposal site, characteristics of the coal ash and FGD wastes, control method and the degree of control employed. In general, the major potential impacts are ground and surface water contamination and the "degradation" of large quantities of land. However, assuming land is available for disposal of these wastes, control technology exists for environmentally sound disposal. Because of existing increases in coal use, the possibility of significant environmental impacts, both regionally and nationally, exists regardless of whether the NEP scenario develops or not. Existing baseline data indicate that with sound control technology and successful development and implementation of existing regulatory framework, regional scale impacts are likely to be small; however, site-specific impacts could be significant and need to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Both Federal and privately-funded programs are developing additional data and information on disposal of FGD sludges and coal ash. Continuation of these programs will provide additional vital information in the future. However, further information in several areas if desirable: further data on levels of radionuclides and trace metals in these wastes: studies on biological impacts of trace metals; and completion of current and planned studies on disposal problems associated with advanced combustion techniques like fluid bed combustion.
本文聚焦于根据国家能源计划(NEP),公用事业和工业煤炭使用量增加所带来的粉煤灰和烟气脱硫(FGD)废弃物的增量影响。在本文中,1985年和2000年为评估点,使用的基线数据取自《年度环境分析报告》(AEAR,1977年9月)。在每个美国环境保护局(EPA)区域,已大致估算了潜在的处置选项组合,并据此评估了影响。此外,还考虑了先进燃烧技术的未来应用。粉煤灰和FGD废弃物的数量取决于煤炭的灰分和硫含量、排放法规、灰分收集和FGD系统的类型以及系统和锅炉的运行条件。这些废弃物的处置(或即将进行的处置)受联邦和州法规的约束。关于对土地环境影响的一个关键法律框架是《资源保护与回收法》(RCRA)。RCRA以及相关的联邦和州法律为防止粉煤灰和FGD废弃物处置产生重大的不利健康和环境影响提供了充分的法定依据。然而,具体法规的许多制定和实施工作尚待开展。FGD废弃物以及粉煤灰和FGD废弃物目前完全在陆地上处置。最常见的陆地处置方法是筑坝(池塘)和填埋,不过也有一些矿山处置方式。这种处置方式的潜在环境影响取决于处置场地的特征、粉煤灰和FGD废弃物的特征、控制方法以及所采用的控制程度。一般来说,主要的潜在影响是地下水和地表水的污染以及大量土地的“退化”。然而,假设存在可用于处置这些废弃物的土地,那么存在环境无害化处置的控制技术。由于煤炭使用量现有的增加,无论NEP情景是否发展,在区域和国家层面都存在重大环境影响的可能性。现有的基线数据表明,通过合理的控制技术以及现有监管框架的成功制定和实施,区域规模的影响可能较小;然而,特定场地的影响可能很大,需要逐案评估。联邦和私人资助的项目都在开发关于FGD污泥和粉煤灰处置的更多数据和信息。这些项目的持续开展将在未来提供更多重要信息。然而,在几个领域还需要进一步信息:这些废弃物中放射性核素和痕量金属含量的更多数据;痕量金属生物影响的研究;以及完成当前和计划中关于与流化床燃烧等先进燃烧技术相关的处置问题的研究。