• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多发性骨髓瘤的预后临床与形态学分类(作者译)

[Prognostic clinical and morphological classification of multiple myeloma (author's transl)].

作者信息

Wutke K, Rüdiger K D, Kelényi G

出版信息

Arch Geschwulstforsch. 1979;49(8):671-84.

PMID:543783
Abstract

Clinical staging has been widely accepted as essential for optimal treatment of many types of cancer. Various groups of workers have investigated factors which influence prognosis in multiple myeloma. Important factors which have been indentified include the performance status, the presence or absence of renal insufficiency, the quantity of the monoclonal protein fraction in the serum, the extent of bone lesions, the serum concentration of albumin and calcium, and the hemoglobin level. Since our findings agreed with the staging, previously proposed by Salmon, this procedure was used to stage myeloma cases in a retrospective study. Survival was statistically significant shorter in stage III than in stage I and in subtype B shorter than in subtype A. In addition to the clinical findings we propose a system for the cytological and histological staging of multiple myeloma which is based on differences in maturity of myeloma cells and have tested its validity in predicting survival in a retrospective follow-up study. 202 cases of multiple myeloma have been analysed by cytological and histological methods. On the basis of the findings the following types were distinguished: 1. plasmocytic myeloma (127 cases), 2. plasmoblastic-plasmocytic myeloma (35 cases), and 3. plasmoblastic myeloma (32 cases). In 8 cases predominance of giant cells were seen. In types 2 and 3 involvement of extraskeletal sites (lymph node, liver, spleen) was significantly higher than in type 1, just as survival was significantly higher (39,7 months) in this type than in type 3 (9,8 months). There seemed to be no correlation between morphological type and class specificity of monoclonal immunoglobulins. Use of the clinical and morphological staging system should provide better initial assessment and follow-up of individual patients, and should lead to improved study design and analysis in large clinical trials of diagnosis and therapy for multiple myeloma.

摘要

临床分期已被广泛认为是多种癌症最佳治疗的关键。不同的研究团队已对影响多发性骨髓瘤预后的因素进行了调查。已确定的重要因素包括身体状况、肾功能不全的有无、血清中单克隆蛋白组分的量、骨病变的程度、血清白蛋白和钙的浓度以及血红蛋白水平。由于我们的研究结果与Salmon先前提出的分期一致,因此在一项回顾性研究中采用该方法对骨髓瘤病例进行分期。Ⅲ期患者的生存期在统计学上显著短于Ⅰ期患者,B亚型患者的生存期显著短于A亚型患者。除了临床发现外,我们还提出了一种基于骨髓瘤细胞成熟度差异的多发性骨髓瘤细胞学和组织学分期系统,并在一项回顾性随访研究中检验了其预测生存期的有效性。我们采用细胞学和组织学方法分析了202例多发性骨髓瘤病例。根据研究结果区分出以下类型:1. 浆细胞性骨髓瘤(127例),2. 成浆细胞 - 浆细胞性骨髓瘤(35例),3. 成浆细胞性骨髓瘤(32例)。8例可见巨细胞占优势。在第2型和第3型中,骨骼外部位(淋巴结、肝脏、脾脏)受累明显高于第1型,同样,该型患者的生存期(39.7个月)也明显高于第3型患者(9.8个月)。形态学类型与单克隆免疫球蛋白的类别特异性之间似乎没有相关性。使用临床和形态学分期系统应能为个体患者提供更好的初始评估和随访,并应能改进多发性骨髓瘤诊断和治疗大型临床试验的研究设计和分析。

相似文献

1
[Prognostic clinical and morphological classification of multiple myeloma (author's transl)].多发性骨髓瘤的预后临床与形态学分类(作者译)
Arch Geschwulstforsch. 1979;49(8):671-84.
2
Classification and prognostic evaluation in multiple myeloma. A retrospective study of relationship of survivals and responses to chemotherapy to immunological types, 20 single prognostic factors, 15 clinical staging systems, and 6 morphological classifications.多发性骨髓瘤的分类与预后评估。一项关于生存及化疗反应与免疫类型、20个单一预后因素、15种临床分期系统及6种形态学分类之间关系的回顾性研究。
Panminerva Med. 1991 Apr-Jun;33(2):93-110.
3
Cytological and histological classification of multiple myeloma.多发性骨髓瘤的细胞学和组织学分类
Haematologia (Budap). 1981;14(3):315-29.
4
[Analysis of the international staging system of multiple myeloma and its comparison with the DS and IFM staging system in 122 Chinese patients].[多发性骨髓瘤国际分期系统分析及其与122例中国患者的DS和IFM分期系统的比较]
Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2008 Apr;29(4):217-21.
5
[Utility of the examination of plasma-cell morphology in the study of multiple myeloma].[浆细胞形态学检查在多发性骨髓瘤研究中的应用]
Sangre (Barc). 1992 Jun;37(3):175-9.
6
[Prognostic analysis and assessment on the clinical staging systems of multiple myeloma--a report of 206 cases].多发性骨髓瘤临床分期系统的预后分析与评估——附206例报告
Ai Zheng. 2006 Apr;25(4):461-4.
7
International prognostic index (IPI)--a critical comparison with five multiple myeloma staging systems in the group of 270 patients treated by conventional chemotherapy.国际预后指数(IPI)——与270例接受传统化疗的患者群体中五种多发性骨髓瘤分期系统的关键比较。
Neoplasma. 2006;53(4):277-84.
8
International staging system for multiple myeloma.多发性骨髓瘤国际分期系统
J Clin Oncol. 2005 May 20;23(15):3412-20. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.242. Epub 2005 Apr 4.
9
Prognostic factors and staging systems of multiple myeloma:多发性骨髓瘤的预后因素及分期系统:
Chin Med J (Engl). 2007 Oct 5;120(19):1655-8.
10
[Prognostic evaluation in multiple myeloma. Relationship between immunological types, single prognostic factors, clinical staging systems, morphological classification systems and survival].
Ann Ital Med Int. 1990 Jul-Sep;5(3 Pt 1):195-204.