Suppr超能文献

视力受损导致不适宜驾驶情况下的专业判断(作者译)

[Professional discretion in cases of unfitness to drive due to impaired vision (author's transl)].

作者信息

Mewe L

出版信息

Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1979 Oct;175(4):557-61.

PMID:548626
Abstract

The question of professional discretion is discussed in relation to cases where the physician believes that the patient's visual impairment renders him unfit to drive. It is often difficult for the ophthalmologist to make a valid judgment. Since physicians are not bound to report such cases to the traffic authorities or to third persons, any assumption of responsibility in making a statement, either without the patient's knowledge or against his will, is an infringement of professional secrecy. Article 34 of the (West German) Penal Code makes provision for "justified" disclosures. There is also a relevant verdict of the German Federal Supreme Court dated Oct. 8, 1968, case ref. VIZR 168/67, which deals with basic considerations. However, it is advisable in each case to consult the legal adviser of the responsible Medical Council prior to making any disclosure in order to establish whether it is justified.

摘要

针对医生认为患者视力受损不适合开车的情况,讨论了专业保密的问题。眼科医生往往很难做出有效的判断。由于医生没有义务向交通管理部门或第三方报告此类情况,因此在患者不知情或违背其意愿的情况下发表声明承担任何责任,都是对专业保密的侵犯。(西德)《刑法典》第34条规定了“合理”披露的情况。德国联邦最高法院1968年10月8日也有一项相关裁决,案号为VIZR 168/67,涉及基本考量因素。然而,在每次披露之前,最好先咨询负责的医学委员会的法律顾问,以确定这种披露是否合理。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验