Lütschg J
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1979 Dec;117(6):911-21.
After a short historic introduction, the article describes the total endoprotheses of the knee used in our hospital. This is followed by a description of the case material. The follow-ups of the 51 total endoprotheses of the knee applied between April 1971 and October 1975, covered the following criteria: Pain, extent of mobility, extension deficit, stability and walking performance. The article subsequently reviews the complications occurring with the hinged and hingeless total endoprostheses of the knee. Pain, extent of mobility and stability are evaluated via a system of points, thus enabling an evaluation of the functional results of the individual prostheses. During the following discussion, our results are compared with those of three other follow-ups. Comparisons are not always possible, because the evaluation standards may differ. However, we believe that we can say that our results do not differ significantly from those of the studies against which they were compared. In both cases, the complications are mainly the same. With particular reference to a comparision of the results obtained with the Freeman-Swanson prostheses, the results obtained by Freeman during both periods of time were superior to ours. Our experiences with the hingeless Freeman-Swanson prosthesis are rather better than those obtained with the hinged prostheses according to Shiers ans Guépar, especially with regard to the frequency of loosening and infection. However, it must be borne in mind that the follow-up control times are shorter for the Freeman-Swanson prostheses. We believe that implantation of a hinged prosthesis in joints with severe malpositioning of the axis, severe deformities, and instability, continues to be indicated.
在简短的历史介绍之后,本文描述了我院使用的全膝关节假体。接下来是病例材料的描述。对1971年4月至1975年10月期间应用的51例全膝关节假体的随访涵盖了以下标准:疼痛、活动范围、伸展受限、稳定性和行走能力。本文随后回顾了膝关节铰链式和非铰链式全膝关节假体出现的并发症。通过评分系统对疼痛、活动范围和稳定性进行评估,从而能够评估各个假体的功能结果。在接下来的讨论中,我们将我们的结果与其他三项随访结果进行了比较。由于评估标准可能不同,并非总能进行比较。然而,我们认为可以说,我们的结果与与之比较的研究结果没有显著差异。在这两种情况下,并发症基本相同。特别提及与弗里曼 - 斯旺森假体所获结果的比较,弗里曼在两个时间段所获结果均优于我们的。我们使用非铰链式弗里曼 - 斯旺森假体的经验比根据希尔兹和盖帕尔的铰链式假体经验要好,尤其是在松动和感染频率方面。然而,必须记住,弗里曼 - 斯旺森假体的随访控制时间较短。我们认为,对于轴线严重错位、严重畸形和不稳定的关节,植入铰链式假体仍然是必要的。