Suppr超能文献

眼动脉压测量法:重新评估

Ophthalmodynamometry: a reappraisal.

作者信息

Batko K A, Appen R E

出版信息

Ann Ophthalmol. 1979 Oct;11(10):1499-508.

PMID:555844
Abstract

The accuracy of ophthalmodynamometry (ODM) was retrospectively analyzed in 36 patients who had ophthalmic examinations prior to carotid arteriography. In 75% of those patients, ODM correctly predicted the presence of absence of significant stenosis (ie, 50% or greater) or occlusion of the internal carotid artery. A 30% false-negative rate and 19% false-positive rate was found in this study. The accuracy was not improved when the examiner had more experience with the test. The accuracy of ODM with staff members who regularly perform the examination was 68% as compared to the ophthalmology residents' accuracy of 76%. Causes of false-negative and positive results include subjectivity of the examination, stenosis of arteries other than the internal carotids, and development of collateral circulation as was demonstrated arteriographically in 2 of our patients.

摘要

对36例在颈动脉造影之前接受眼科检查的患者进行了回顾性分析,以评估眼动脉压测量法(ODM)的准确性。在这些患者中,75%的患者中,ODM能够正确预测颈内动脉是否存在严重狭窄(即50%或更高)或闭塞。本研究发现假阴性率为30%,假阳性率为19%。当检查者对该检查有更多经验时,准确性并未提高。与眼科住院医师76%的准确率相比,定期进行该检查的工作人员使用ODM的准确率为68%。假阴性和阳性结果的原因包括检查的主观性、颈内动脉以外的动脉狭窄以及侧支循环的形成,正如我们的2例患者动脉造影所显示的那样。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验