Deitz J C, Slaymaker J
Am J Occup Ther. 1979 Apr;33(4):249-54.
Expressed dissatisfaction with the rating aspect of the Field Work Performance Report (FWPR) led to a study of the following proposed revisions: the present FWPR scale was extended by one point (from 4 to 5), the possible points were redefined quantitatively, and a qualitative factor was added. Both the present form and the revised form of the FWPR were administered to field work students from two schools to determine if these revisions would result in more effective and meaningful distributions of item scores and total scores. To make this determination, statistical analyses were employed and comments from participating clinical supervisors were invited. Findings indicated that the revised form dispersed scores more effectively and meaningfully. However, the analyses also pointed to the need for further revisions.
对实地工作绩效报告（FWPR）评分方面的不满引发了对以下拟议修订的研究：将现行的FWPR量表延长一分（从4分增至5分），对可能的分数进行了定量重新定义，并增加了一个定性因素。FWPR的现行表格和修订表格都发放给了来自两所学校的实地工作学生，以确定这些修订是否会使项目分数和总分的分布更有效且更有意义。为了做出这一判断，进行了统计分析并征求了参与的临床督导的意见。结果表明，修订后的表格能更有效且更有意义地分散分数。然而，分析也指出需要进一步修订。
