Hinderliter C F, Riccio D C
Am J Psychol. 1977 Sep;90(3):407-18.
In Experiment I, prior experience with passive-avoidance training followed by latent extinction was given 1, 3, 5, or 15 days before criterion (re) training and an amnesic treatment. It produced nearly complete protection from retrograde amnesia at the three shorter intervals; at the longest interval, amnesia was present but less severe than in a control group without the familiarization. In Experiment II, prior experience was given 1, 5, or 15 days before a noncontingent shock and an amnesic treatment. Evidence of a reactivation of memory was obtained only at the longest interval. Thus, familiarization and reactivation seem to represent different processes. The results are interpreted as consistent with explanations stressing the disruption of retrieval in retrograde amnesia.
在实验I中，在标准（重新）训练和遗忘处理前1、3、5或15天，给予被动回避训练及随后的潜在消退的先验经验。在较短的三个间隔时间，它产生了几乎完全的逆行性遗忘保护；在最长的间隔时间，遗忘存在，但比没有熟悉化的对照组轻。在实验II中，在非条件性电击和遗忘处理前1、5或15天给予先验经验。仅在最长的间隔时间获得了记忆重新激活的证据。因此，熟悉化和重新激活似乎代表了不同的过程。结果被解释为与强调逆行性遗忘中检索破坏的解释一致。
