• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为电休克后行为表现下降决定因素的强化幅度

Reinforcement magnitude as a determinant of performance decrement after electroconvulsive shock.

作者信息

Ray O S, Bivens L W

出版信息

Science. 1968 Apr 19;160(3825):330-2. doi: 10.1126/science.160.3825.330.

DOI:10.1126/science.160.3825.330
PMID:5641269
Abstract

The intensity of a foot shock may be a determinant of the rate at which an avoidance response becomes resistant to disruption by electroconvulsive shock. Mice were trained, one trial a day, in a passive avoidance learning task, with one of three foot-shock intensities. Electroconvulsive shock was administered at various intervals after each trial. At all foot-shock intensities, electroconvulsive shock given 10 seconds after each training trial was eflective in disrupting learning. Where electroconvulsive shock was given at longer intervals after each trial, those animals learning at low intensities of foot shock showed greater impairment of performance than those learning at high intensities.

摘要

足部电击的强度可能是回避反应对电惊厥休克干扰产生抗性的速率的一个决定因素。小鼠每天接受一次训练,在被动回避学习任务中,使用三种足部电击强度之一。每次试验后在不同间隔施加电惊厥休克。在所有足部电击强度下,每次训练试验后10秒给予的电惊厥休克能有效干扰学习。在每次试验后较长间隔给予电惊厥休克时,那些以低强度足部电击学习的动物比以高强度学习的动物表现出更大的行为损伤。

相似文献

1
Reinforcement magnitude as a determinant of performance decrement after electroconvulsive shock.作为电休克后行为表现下降决定因素的强化幅度
Science. 1968 Apr 19;160(3825):330-2. doi: 10.1126/science.160.3825.330.
2
Retrieval failure induced by electroconvulsive shock: reversal with dissimilar training and recovery agents.电惊厥休克诱导的检索失败:用不同的训练和恢复剂逆转。
Science. 1972 Aug 18;177(4049):628-30. doi: 10.1126/science.177.4049.628.
3
RETROGRADE AMNESIA FROM ELECTROCONVULSIVE SHOCK IN A ONE-TRIAL APPETITIVE LEARNING TASK.在一次性食欲学习任务中电休克所致的逆行性遗忘
Science. 1965 May 28;148(3674):1248-50. doi: 10.1126/science.148.3674.1248.
4
ESCAPE BEHAVIOR UNDER DIFFERENT FIXED RATIOS AND SHOCK INTENSITIES.不同固定比率和电击强度下的逃避行为
J Exp Anal Behav. 1965 Mar;8(2):117-24. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1965.8-117.
5
Preshock trauma and electroconvulsive shock as agents affecting subsequent response to punishment.
Physiol Behav. 1970 Apr;5(4):413-6. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(70)90244-1.
6
The effects of electroconvulsive shock on the action of a reinforcing stimulus.电休克对强化刺激作用的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Nov;9(6):663-9. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-663.
7
The effect of stimuli followed by response-independent shock on shock-avoidance behavior.与反应无关的电击刺激对回避电击行为的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Jul;14(1):11-21. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-11.
8
Sensitivity and reactivity to foot shock following electroconvulsive shock stimulation.电惊厥休克刺激后对足部电击的敏感性和反应性。
Physiol Behav. 1970 Apr;5(4):397-405. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(70)90242-8.
9
Retrograde amnesia: production of skseletal but not cardiac response gradient by electroconvulsive shock.逆行性遗忘:电休克引起骨骼而非心脏反应梯度的产生。
Science. 1970 Sep 18;169(3951):1224-6. doi: 10.1126/science.169.3951.1224.
10
Hippocampal activity during memory disruption of passive avoidance by electroconvulsive shock.电休克对被动回避记忆干扰期间的海马体活动。
Life Sci I. 1970 Aug 15;9(16):909-18. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(70)90075-5.

引用本文的文献

1
The amygdala modulates memory consolidation of fear-motivated inhibitory avoidance learning but not classical fear conditioning.杏仁核调节恐惧驱动的抑制性回避学习的记忆巩固,但不调节经典恐惧条件反射。
J Neurosci. 2000 Sep 15;20(18):7059-66. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-18-07059.2000.
2
A parallel study of the amnesic effects of cycloheximide and ECS under different strengths of conditioning.在不同强度条件作用下,环己酰亚胺和电惊厥休克失忆效应的平行研究。
Psychopharmacologia. 1970;16(4):281-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00404734.
3
Pentylenetetrazol-induced amnesia: a case for overt seizures.
戊四氮诱发的失忆症:显性癫痫发作的一个实例
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1976 Jul 9;48(1):19-23. doi: 10.1007/BF00423301.