Vetter G H, Hearst E
J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Nov;11(6):753-65. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-753.
Pigeons learned to peck a green key on which parallelogram-shapes were projected; they then received generalization tests in which the orientation of the parallelogram was varied. Nondifferential training produced very little eventual stimulus control along the orientation dimension, but when training included S- trials (absence of the parallelogram) subjects responded consistently more to certain orientations than to others. Unlike typical results for visual generalization (e.g., line-tilt), the tilt gradients obtained for this complex stimulus were bimodal, supporting predictions on the basis of human perceptual data. However, unimodal gradients could be produced by specific discrimination training along the orientation dimension. Other forms of intradimensional training also produced relatively steep gradients, often characterized by unexpected but consistent secondary peaks. An attempt to obtain inhibitory gradients (S+: green key; S-: parallelogram on a green background) resulted in virtually zero responding all along the shape-orientation dimension; therefore, specific inhibitory control could not be evaluated. All these experiments suggest that definition of this complex stimulus dimension in terms of mere "angular orientation" is inappropriate, and alternative interpretations are discussed.
鸽子学会了啄一个投射有平行四边形形状的绿色按键;然后它们接受了泛化测试,其中平行四边形的方向是变化的。非差异训练在方向维度上最终产生的刺激控制很少,但当训练包括S-试验(平行四边形不存在)时,与其他方向相比,受试者对某些方向的反应始终更多。与视觉泛化的典型结果(例如,线倾斜)不同,这种复杂刺激获得的倾斜梯度是双峰的,这支持了基于人类感知数据的预测。然而,通过沿方向维度的特定辨别训练可以产生单峰梯度。其他形式的维度内训练也产生了相对陡峭的梯度,通常以意外但一致的次峰为特征。尝试获得抑制梯度(S+:绿色按键;S-:绿色背景上的平行四边形)导致在整个形状-方向维度上几乎没有反应;因此,无法评估特定的抑制控制。所有这些实验表明,仅根据“角度方向”来定义这个复杂的刺激维度是不合适的,并讨论了其他解释。