Burford R, Averill R F
Med Care. 1979 Apr;17(4):369-81. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197904000-00005.
Professional Standards Review Organization (PSRO) operating guidelines recommend the use of Professional Activity Study (PAS) length of stay norms for conducting concurrent review. These norms, determined by aggregating discharge abstracts from PAS hospitals in the same United States census region, are assigned to patients based only on information known at admission. This study investigated the relationship between patient information available at admission and the information available at discharge in light of its effects on the concurrent review process. Analyzing 52,210 patient records from 68 hospitals in one PSRO setting, it was found that changes in patients' primary diagnosis resulted in changes in their PAS diagnostic category for 41.3 per cent of the patients. A change in PAS diagnostic caetgory after the assignment of the review norm resulted in missed and unnecessary reviews as well as early and late reviews. These findings indicate that there are serious operational problems with the current method of performing concurrent review.
专业标准评审组织(PSRO)的操作指南建议在进行同步评审时使用专业活动研究(PAS)住院时长规范。这些规范是通过汇总美国同一人口普查区域内PAS医院的出院摘要确定的,仅根据入院时已知的信息分配给患者。本研究根据患者入院时可用信息与出院时可用信息对同步评审过程的影响,调查了二者之间的关系。通过分析一个PSRO环境中68家医院的52210份患者记录,发现41.3%的患者其主要诊断的变化导致了PAS诊断类别的变化。在分配评审规范后PAS诊断类别发生变化,导致了评审遗漏和不必要的评审,以及过早和过晚的评审。这些发现表明,当前进行同步评审的方法存在严重的操作问题。