Drew R, Piestly B G
Pharmacology. 1979;18(4):202-9. doi: 10.1159/000137253.
The effects of subacute administration of chlorpromazine HCI (CPZ), erythromycine base and erythromycin estolate on the cholestatic response to intravenous taurolithocholate (TLC) and taurochenodeoxycholate (TCDC) in the rat were investigated. All three enhanced the recovery of bile flow after TCDC but not after TLC. Erythromycin base and estolate enhanced bile flow recovery after TCDC and potentiated the increase of plasma 5'-nucleotidase, as did CPZ. Neither erythromycin estolate nor CPZ precipitated a cholestatic response in rat maintained for 9-13 days on a diet supplemented with 0.05% lithocholic acid. It is concluded that the interaction of CPZ and erythromycins with bile salts is not based on the cholestatic properties of the drugs, and hence is not a practical way of distinguishing cholestatic from non-cholestatic drugs.
研究了盐酸氯丙嗪(CPZ)、红霉素碱和无味红霉素对大鼠静脉注射牛磺石胆酸(TLC)和牛磺鹅去氧胆酸(TCDC)后胆汁淤积反应的亚急性给药效果。所有这三种药物均增强了TCDC给药后胆汁流量的恢复,但未增强TLC给药后的胆汁流量恢复。红霉素碱和无味红霉素增强了TCDC给药后胆汁流量的恢复,并增强了血浆5'-核苷酸酶的升高,CPZ也有此作用。在补充了0.05%石胆酸的饮食中维持9至13天的大鼠,无味红霉素和CPZ均未引发胆汁淤积反应。得出的结论是,CPZ和红霉素与胆盐的相互作用并非基于药物的胆汁淤积特性,因此不是区分胆汁淤积性药物和非胆汁淤积性药物的实用方法。