Johnstone J, Galin D, Herron J
Int J Neurosci. 1979;9(2):71-80. doi: 10.3109/00207457909147222.
Left-and right-handers have been reported to differ in lateral hemispheric specialization for cognition. We compared different methods of dividing subjects into handedness groups: preference(a 12-item questionnaire), performance(speed, strength, dexterity), and preference plus performance, and determined which method of handedness classification indicated the greatest group differences on EEG and dichotic measures of lateral specialization. All handedness measures were significantly intercorrelated. These handedness measures were significantly correlated with the dichotic test over the whole population but were significantly correlated with EEG asymmetry only in females. Scoring degree of handedness showed significant relationships to lateral specialization which were not seen when subjects were classified into discrete handedness groups. Ambidextrous subjects performed as well as right- or left-handers on unimanual tasks despite a lack of hand preference. The hand used for writing was shown to be too limited to be used as the sole index of handedness in studies related to cognition.
据报道,左利手和右利手在认知的半球侧化专门化方面存在差异。我们比较了将受试者分为利手组的不同方法:偏好(一份12项问卷)、表现(速度、力量、灵巧性)以及偏好加表现,并确定哪种利手分类方法在脑电图(EEG)和双耳分听侧化专门化测量中显示出最大的组间差异。所有利手测量指标之间都显著相互关联。这些利手测量指标在整个人口中与双耳分听测试显著相关,但仅在女性中与EEG不对称显著相关。利手得分程度与侧化专门化显示出显著关系,而当将受试者分为离散的利手组时则未观察到这种关系。尽管没有手偏好,但双手灵巧的受试者在单手任务中的表现与右利手或左利手一样好。在与认知相关的研究中,用于书写的手被证明过于局限,不能用作利手的唯一指标。