Suppr超能文献

电切术与冷刀尿道切开术治疗尿道狭窄的对比研究。

A comparative study of electrosurgical vs. cold urethrotomy in the treatment of urethral strictures.

作者信息

Netto N R, Lemos G C, Figueiredo J A

出版信息

Int Urol Nephrol. 1979;11(4):311-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02086818.

Abstract

Thirty-one patients with urethral stricture were subjected to internal urethrotomy under visual control. The patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical procedure: electrosurgical or cold resection. A modification of the Sachse knife was introduced in order to permit its use with the American Cystoscope Makers Inc. instruments. The success rate with cold resection was 81.81% and with the electrosurgical procedure 40%. Internal urethrotomy with cold resection is a simple and harmless operation, being a first choice in the treatment of urethral stricture.

摘要

31例尿道狭窄患者在直视下接受了内尿道切开术。根据手术方法将患者分为两组:电切术组或冷切术组。为了使其能与美国膀胱镜制造商公司的器械配合使用,对萨克泽刀进行了改良。冷切术的成功率为81.81%,电切术的成功率为40%。冷切内尿道切开术是一种简单且无害的手术,是治疗尿道狭窄的首选方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验