Marsico F, Calabrò R, Forni N, Casale A, Mastrobuoni G
G Ital Cardiol. 1979;9(1):61-5.
53 patients affected by congenital valvular or discrete aortic stenosis have been evaluated in order to compare the observed gradient with the one expected according to multifactorial analysis based on electrocardiographic and auscultatory data deviced by Ellison et al. There Authors employed this formula for the evaluation of the valvular form only. In our experience all cases of valvular stenosis showing an estimated gradient less than or equal to 40 mmHg were found to have a gradient less than or equal to 40 mmHg at the catheterization. This statement is true in the discrete form as well, only if the estimated gradient was less than or equal to 30 mmHg. The regression curve between the two gradients shows a r = 0.718 (p less than 0.01); an even better correlation was found in the valvular forms (r = 0.816; p less than 0.01). These results are very useful since they allow to restrict indication to catheterization only to the cases in which the obstruction is estimated to necessitate a surgical intervention.
为了将观察到的压力阶差与根据埃里森等人设计的基于心电图和听诊数据的多因素分析所预期的压力阶差进行比较,我们对53例患有先天性瓣膜或局限性主动脉瓣狭窄的患者进行了评估。这些作者仅使用此公式来评估瓣膜形态。根据我们的经验,所有估计压力阶差小于或等于40 mmHg的瓣膜狭窄病例在导管检查时压力阶差均小于或等于40 mmHg。对于局限性瓣膜狭窄,仅当估计压力阶差小于或等于30 mmHg时,上述情况才成立。两种压力阶差之间的回归曲线显示r = 0.718(p < 0.01);在瓣膜性狭窄中发现相关性更好(r = 0.816;p < 0.01)。这些结果非常有用,因为它们可以将导管检查的适应症仅限制于估计梗阻需要手术干预的病例。