Ménard S, Colnaghi M I
Tumori. 1977 Jan-Feb;63(1):59-68. doi: 10.1177/030089167706300108.
In a complement-dependent 51Cr cytotoxicity assay, using as target murine fibrosarcoma or lymphosarcoma cells, the rabbit complement (RC) was more efficient than guinea pig complement (GPC) when tested either with strong antisera, such as antihistocompatibility sera, or with weak sera, such as wera from normal mice shown previously to posses a natural antitumor response. The high efficiency of RC was not due to activation by antibodies of a different class or specificity than those activating GPC. In fact, both 2-mercaptoethanol (2-Me)-sensitive or-resistant immunoglobulins could activate both RC and GPC, and the results of absorption tests indicated that the antibodies detected using either of the 2 complements were directed against the same specificities. In addition, the results of tests searching for cooperative antibodies excluded that a cooperative effect might be responsible for the high efficiency of RC. With weak antisera, sera of different rabbits were found to have different complement activity.
在一项补体依赖的51Cr细胞毒性试验中,以鼠纤维肉瘤或淋巴肉瘤细胞作为靶细胞,当使用强抗血清(如抗组织相容性血清)或弱血清(如先前显示具有天然抗肿瘤反应的正常小鼠的血清)进行测试时,兔补体(RC)比豚鼠补体(GPC)更有效。RC的高效性并非由于与激活GPC的抗体不同类或特异性的抗体激活所致。事实上,2-巯基乙醇(2-Me)敏感或抗性的免疫球蛋白均可激活RC和GPC,吸收试验结果表明,使用两种补体之一检测到的抗体针对相同的特异性。此外,寻找协同抗体的试验结果排除了协同效应可能是RC高效性的原因。使用弱抗血清时,发现不同兔子的血清具有不同的补体活性。