Suppr超能文献

评估用于测量细胞完整性的血小板检测方法。

Evaluation of platelet tests for measurement of cell integrity.

作者信息

Akkerman J W, Doucet-De Bruïne M H, Gorter G, De Graaf S, Holme S, Lips J P, Numeuer A, Over J, Starkenburg A E, Trieschnigg A C, Veen J V, Vlooswijk H A, Wester J, Sixma J J

出版信息

Thromb Haemost. 1978 Feb 28;39(1):146-57.

PMID:580490
Abstract

Various tests were evaluated for their capacity to differentiate between platelet suspensions with different degrees of cell damage. Those suspensions were prepared by simultaneous isolation of platelets from the same platelet-rich plasma (PRP) using the following procedures: 1. centrifugation at 4 degrees C with EDTA 2. gel filtration in Tangen's buffer 3. gel filtration in Ca2+-free Tyrode's soltuion 4. gel filtration in Ca2+-free Tyrode followed by dehydration against polyethylene glycol 20,000 and 5. albumin density gradient centrifugation. In these suspensions and in the original PRP the following parameters were studied: 1. morphology; 2. aggregability upon ADP addition; 3. platelet factor 3 availability; 4. uptake of 14C-serotonin and 3H-adenine; 5. metabolism of 3H-adenine and adenylate energy charge; 6. endogenous total ATP, ADP and serotonin and 7. lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity. Quantitation of pseudopod formation in the light or electron microscope and log dose response studies for ADP-induced aggregation proved to be the most sensitive and reproducible of the tests studied. Additional information could be obtained from measurement of the 3H-label in the ATP and hypoxanthine-inosine fractions and calculation of the adenylate energy charge. Determination of platelet factor 3 availability or uptake studies of 14C-serotonin and 3H-adenine were less suitable for discriminating between cell suspensions. Data for total ATP and serotonin concentrations and LDH activity differed between the cell suspensions but instead of detecting various degrees of cell damage they reflected alterations in platelet population caused by the isolation procedures.

摘要

对各种测试进行了评估,以确定它们区分不同程度细胞损伤的血小板悬浮液的能力。这些悬浮液是通过以下步骤从同一富血小板血浆(PRP)中同时分离血小板制备的:1. 在4℃下用EDTA离心;2. 在Tangen缓冲液中进行凝胶过滤;3. 在无Ca2+的Tyrode溶液中进行凝胶过滤;4. 在无Ca2+的Tyrode溶液中进行凝胶过滤,然后用聚乙二醇20,000脱水;5. 白蛋白密度梯度离心。在这些悬浮液和原始PRP中,研究了以下参数:1. 形态学;2. 添加ADP后的聚集性;3. 血小板因子3的可用性;4. 14C-5-羟色胺和3H-腺嘌呤的摄取;5. 3H-腺嘌呤的代谢和腺苷酸能量电荷;6. 内源性总ATP、ADP和5-羟色胺;7. 乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)活性。在光学或电子显微镜下对伪足形成进行定量以及对ADP诱导的聚集进行对数剂量反应研究,被证明是所研究测试中最敏感和可重复的。通过测量ATP和次黄嘌呤-肌苷部分中的3H标记以及计算腺苷酸能量电荷,可以获得更多信息。测定血小板因子3的可用性或对14C-5-羟色胺和3H-腺嘌呤的摄取研究不太适合区分细胞悬浮液。细胞悬浮液之间的总ATP和5-羟色胺浓度以及LDH活性数据不同,但它们不是检测不同程度的细胞损伤,而是反映了分离程序引起的血小板群体变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验