Suppr超能文献

头孢地尼与头孢唑林和头孢噻吩治疗小鼠实验性感染的比较。

Comparison of cefazedone with cefazolin and cephalothin in treatment of experimental infections in mice.

作者信息

Bergmann R, Wahlig H, Mitsuhashi S

出版信息

Arzneimittelforschung. 1979;29(2a):412-4.

PMID:582716
Abstract

The chemotherapeutic efficacy of (6R,7R)-7-(2-[3,5-dichloro-4-oxo-1(4H)-pyridyl]-acetamido)-3-([(5-methyl-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)-thio)-8-oxo-5-thia-1-azabicyclo[4,2,0]oct-2-ene-2-carboxylic acid (cefazedone, Refosporen) was assayed in comparison to cefazolin and cephalothin in experimental bacterial murine infections with 6 gram-positive and 8 gram-negative strains of the genera Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Pneumococcus, Escherichia, Klebsiella, Proteus, Pasteurella and Salmonella. In 5 out of 14 strains (Staphylococci, Streptococci, E. coli, Klebsiella) cefazedone was markedly superior to cefazolin, whereas both compounds were of similar activity against the remaining 9 isolates. As compared to cephalothin, cefazedone exhibited highly superior effectiveness in all organisms tested.

摘要

对(6R,7R)-7-(2-[3,5-二氯-4-氧代-1(4H)-吡啶基]-乙酰氨基)-3-([(5-甲基-1,3,4-噻二唑-2-基)-硫代]-8-氧代-5-硫杂-1-氮杂双环[4,2,0]辛-2-烯-2-羧酸(头孢地嗪,瑞伏立新)的化疗效果进行了测定,并与头孢唑林和头孢噻吩进行比较,用于实验性小鼠细菌感染,感染菌株包括葡萄球菌属、链球菌属、肺炎球菌属、大肠杆菌属、克雷伯菌属、变形杆菌属、巴斯德菌属和沙门菌属的6种革兰氏阳性菌和8种革兰氏阴性菌。在14种菌株中的5种(葡萄球菌、链球菌、大肠杆菌、克雷伯菌)里,头孢地嗪明显优于头孢唑林,而这两种化合物对其余9种分离菌的活性相似。与头孢噻吩相比,头孢地嗪在所有测试的生物体中都表现出高度优越的有效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验