Avila J, Bosch A, Aristizábal S, Frías Z, Marcial V
Cancer. 1977 Dec;40(6):2891-5. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197712)40:6<2891::aid-cncr2820400619>3.0.co;2-h.
Ninety-seven consecutive cases of carcinoma of the pinna are reviewed in this report. Fifty-six of the tumors were basal cell and thirty-nine squamous cell carcinoma. Fifty patients were surgically treated and forty-five irradiated. Small and/or peripheral lesions were excised and the large and/or centrally located lesions referred for irradiation. Analysis of the results shows no difference in tumor control rate, and the complication rate was also comparable with both modalities. Although chondritis was seen in three cases after irradiation, it also occurred in one case after excision. Our results indicate that neither modality should be used with total exclusion of the other. Initial resection would seem preferable in small lesions where primary closure is possible and in extensive lesions where a good cosmetic result is precluded by the destruction of normal tissue. Radiotherapy seems of value in those lesions in which resection would result in objectionable cosmetic defect.
本报告回顾了97例连续性耳廓癌病例。其中56例肿瘤为基底细胞癌,39例为鳞状细胞癌。50例患者接受了手术治疗,45例接受了放射治疗。较小和/或周边病变行切除术,较大和/或位于中央的病变转至放疗科。结果分析显示肿瘤控制率无差异,两种治疗方式的并发症发生率也相当。虽然放疗后有3例出现软骨炎,但切除术后也有1例发生。我们的结果表明,两种治疗方式都不应完全排斥另一种。对于小病变且可一期缝合的情况,以及广泛病变因正常组织破坏而无法获得良好美容效果的情况,初始切除术似乎更可取。对于切除会导致令人不满意的美容缺陷的病变,放疗似乎有价值。