Wojciechowski K J
Acta Microbiol Pol. 1976;25(2):145-52.
The agar-gel microimmunodiffusion test (MIDT) with commercially available antirabies sera from different sources was applied to evaluation of rabies infection at about 500 brains from suspected animals. The high nonspecificity of the test and false positive results with nonvirulent materials were stated when compared with the histopathological, biological and FA tests. For evaluation of the nonspecificity and its cause, different antirabies sera and brain antigens from noninfected and rabid animals were used. Absorption of sera with tissue powders or immuno absorbent had a little influence on test specificity. The main causes of nonspecificity was the presence of antibrain antibodies in sera of producers-animals hiperimmunized by brain and spinal cord tissue vaccines. Application of the test to rabies diagnostics without purified control antigens and highly specific sera seems to be unjustified.
采用来自不同来源的市售抗狂犬病血清进行琼脂凝胶微量免疫扩散试验(MIDT),对约500只疑似动物的脑组织进行狂犬病感染评估。与组织病理学、生物学和荧光抗体(FA)试验相比,该试验具有较高的非特异性,且对无毒材料会产生假阳性结果。为评估非特异性及其原因,使用了来自未感染和患狂犬病动物的不同抗狂犬病血清和脑抗原。用组织粉末或免疫吸附剂吸收血清对试验特异性影响不大。非特异性的主要原因是用脑和脊髓组织疫苗进行超免疫的生产动物血清中存在抗脑抗体。在没有纯化对照抗原和高特异性血清的情况下将该试验应用于狂犬病诊断似乎是不合理的。