Morrison L C
Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1977 Aug;54(8):556-66. doi: 10.1097/00006324-197708000-00012.
When the eyes fixate a point in the median plane of the head, the physical surface to which the stereoscopic disparities of "nearer" and "farther" points are referred is the so-called frontal plane horopter. When, however, a point is fixated with the eyes in asymmetrical convergence, the horopter is now rotated with respect to the objective normal plane--that is, the surface that is normal to the direction of gaze. This rotation is believed to pose a problem with veridical stereoscopic localization. It has, therefore, been postulated that in asymmetrical convergence some physiological compensation takes place in order to preserve accurate stereoscopic perception. Some experimental evidence apparently supports this view. The logic of the arguments and the experiments are critically assessed with the conclusion that there is little evidence of any visual modification, nor would any seem likely. A reinterpretation of the stereoscopic axes of reference does occur, but this can be accounted for purely by innervational factors, the visual aspects remaining unchanged.
当双眼注视头部正中面上的一点时,“更近”和“更远”点的立体视差所参照的物理表面就是所谓的额平面双眼单视界。然而,当双眼以不对称集合注视一点时,双眼单视界现在相对于客观垂直平面发生了旋转——也就是说,垂直于注视方向的表面。这种旋转被认为给真实的立体定位带来了问题。因此,有人推测在不对称集合时会发生一些生理补偿,以保持准确的立体视觉。一些实验证据显然支持这一观点。本文对这些论点和实验的逻辑进行了批判性评估,得出的结论是,几乎没有证据表明存在任何视觉修正,而且似乎也不太可能有。确实会对立体参照轴进行重新解释,但这纯粹可以由神经支配因素来解释,视觉方面保持不变。