Nakagawa S, Suenaga M, Sasaki S, Yoshiyama N, Takeuchi J, Kitaoka T, Koshikawa S, Yamada T
Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc. 1977;14:167-73.
Five dialysis and/or adsorbent therapy programmes were compared to examine the biological toxicity of both small and middle molecular fractions from the clinical viewpoint. With combination of various surface areas, diffusion pool sizes, or use of charcoal, what can be called a 'molecular prescription' is possible. The programmes were designed to bring about different degrees of removal of both fractions. Ultrafiltrates obtained with Amicon XM-10 hollow fibre filters before and after a programme were examined for levels of BUN, creatinine, and methylguanidine, inhibitory effect on pyruvate kinase, G-6-PDH, and LDH, and on the cell mortality rate of rat embryo liver cell monolayer culture. The worst results were obtained in those programmes which retained small molecular fractions and removed the middle molecular fractions efficiently. The biological toxicity of the small molecular fraction, from the viewpoint of maintaining the 'milieu intérieur', seems to be much stronger than that of the middle molecular fraction. A dialysis or adsorbent therapy programme removing the middle molecular fraction only, but leaving the small molecular fraction should be considered as putting the cart before the horse.
比较了五种透析和/或吸附治疗方案,从临床角度研究小分子和中分子组分的生物毒性。通过结合不同的表面积、扩散池大小或使用活性炭,可以实现所谓的“分子处方”。这些方案旨在实现对两种组分不同程度的清除。在一个方案前后,使用Amicon XM - 10中空纤维滤器获得的超滤物检测了尿素氮、肌酐和甲基胍水平、对丙酮酸激酶、G - 6 -磷酸脱氢酶和乳酸脱氢酶的抑制作用以及对大鼠胚胎肝细胞单层培养细胞死亡率的影响。在那些保留小分子组分并有效去除中分子组分的方案中得到了最差的结果。从小分子组分对维持“内环境”的角度来看,其生物毒性似乎比中分子组分要强得多。仅去除中分子组分而保留小分子组分的透析或吸附治疗方案应被视为本末倒置。