O'Carroll T M, Blogg C E, Hoinville E A, Savege T M
Anaesthesia. 1977 Oct;32(9):868-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1977.tb10108.x.
In a group of 31 patients undergoing electroconvulsive therapy, there was no significant difference between the times of return of eyelash reflex, swallowing and respiration following a single induction dose of 0.2 mg/kg of etomidate as compared with an induction dose of 0.036 ml/kg of alphaxalone/alphadalone. The incidence of involuntary movements and increased muscle tone was significantly greater after etomidate than following alphaxalone/alphadalone; but the involuntary movements were never marked. The overall incidence of pain on injection was 15% after etomidate. There was a low incidence of venous sequelae following either drug.
在一组31例接受电休克治疗的患者中,单次诱导剂量为0.2mg/kg依托咪酯后的睫毛反射、吞咽及呼吸恢复时间,与诱导剂量为0.036ml/kg阿法沙龙/阿法多龙相比,无显著差异。依托咪酯后不自主运动和肌张力增加的发生率显著高于阿法沙龙/阿法多龙;但不自主运动从不明显。依托咪酯注射时疼痛的总体发生率为15%。两种药物后静脉后遗症的发生率均较低。