Staddon J E
J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Jul;10(4):349-59. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-349.
Pigeons were exposed to a cyclic schedule in which each cycle was composed of twelve 1-min fixed intervals followed by four 3-min fixed intervals; four such cycles comprised an experimental session. The pigeons responded at a much higher average rate during the 3-min intervals than during the 1-min intervals. Other effects were a depression of responding during the first short interval of each cycle and a shortening of postreinforcement pause during the second short interval. The main effect is attributable to a relatively fixed pattern of responding after reinforcement; this pattern consisted in a pause of approximately constant duration followed by responding at an approximately constant rate until the next reinforcement, resulting in much higher average response rates during the longer interreinforcement intervals. The other effects seem attributable to relatively slight differences between the pattern of responding characteristic of later long intervals and the pattern during later short intervals of each cycle. A major implication is that the pigeon is largely insensitive to the sequential properties of many interval-reinforcement schedules. A description of interval-schedule "frustration" phenomena in terms of the inhibitory effects of reinforcement is discussed in relation to these results.
鸽子被置于一个循环时间表中,每个循环由十二个1分钟的固定间隔和随后的四个3分钟的固定间隔组成;四个这样的循环构成一个实验时段。鸽子在3分钟间隔内的平均反应率比在1分钟间隔内高得多。其他影响包括每个循环的第一个短间隔内反应的抑制以及第二个短间隔内强化后停顿的缩短。主要影响可归因于强化后相对固定的反应模式;这种模式包括持续时间大致恒定的停顿,随后是以大致恒定的速率反应,直到下一次强化,这导致在较长的强化间隔期间平均反应率高得多。其他影响似乎可归因于每个循环后期长间隔的反应模式与后期短间隔的反应模式之间相对较小的差异。一个主要的启示是,鸽子在很大程度上对许多间隔强化时间表的顺序特性不敏感。根据这些结果,讨论了用强化的抑制作用来描述间隔时间表“挫折”现象。