University of Florida, USA.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2012 May;97(3):333-46. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2012.97-333.
Six pigeons key-pecked under a fixed-interval (FI) 3-min schedule of food presentation. Each pigeon was studied for 200 daily sessions with 15 intervals per session (3,000 total food presentations). Analyses included the examination of latency to first peck (pause), mean rate of key pecking, and ambulation. Characterizations of stable performance were assessed across measures of behavior and evaluated using commonly employed stability criteria. Stability of response rate and pause was identified better by assessments that evaluated variability and trend, rather than just variability. Between-subject differences in rate of acquisition and terminal values of steady-state performance of pause were observed, and stable pause durations took longer to develop than did stable key-pecking rates. Relative variability in response rate and pause duration decreased as the means increased. A temporally organized pattern of key-pecking (the so-called FI scallop) developed within 50 sessions of exposure to the schedule. Overall ambulation decreased during the early sessions of exposure and further analyses showed greater rates of ambulation during the pause than after it for 4 of the 6 pigeons. Performance under the FI 3-min schedule developed relatively slowly, and key-pecking, pause, and ambulation developed at different rates.
六只鸽子在固定间隔(FI)3 分钟的食物呈现时间表下进行啄键。每只鸽子在 200 天的每日 15 个间隔的实验中(总共 3000 次食物呈现)进行研究。分析包括首次啄键(停顿)潜伏期、啄键平均率和走动的检查。通过评估变异和趋势而不仅仅是评估变异,对行为测量进行稳定性能的特征描述,并使用常用的稳定性标准进行评估。与仅评估变异的方法相比,评估波动和趋势的方法更能准确识别响应率和停顿的稳定性。在获得速度和停顿的稳定状态性能的最终值方面观察到了被试间的差异,并且稳定停顿时间的发展比稳定啄键率的发展要长。随着平均值的增加,响应率和停顿持续时间的相对变异性降低。在接触时间表的 50 次课程中,出现了啄键的时间组织模式(所谓的 FI 扇贝)。在接触的早期阶段,总体走动减少,进一步的分析表明,对于 6 只鸽子中的 4 只,在停顿期间的走动速度比停顿后快。FI 3 分钟时间表下的性能发展相对较慢,啄键、停顿和走动的发展速度不同。