Suppr超能文献

在固定间隔强化程序的长时间暴露下,关键啄食、停顿和行走的发展。

Development of key-pecking, pause, and ambulation during extended exposure to a fixed-interval schedule of reinforcement.

机构信息

University of Florida, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 2012 May;97(3):333-46. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2012.97-333.

Abstract

Six pigeons key-pecked under a fixed-interval (FI) 3-min schedule of food presentation. Each pigeon was studied for 200 daily sessions with 15 intervals per session (3,000 total food presentations). Analyses included the examination of latency to first peck (pause), mean rate of key pecking, and ambulation. Characterizations of stable performance were assessed across measures of behavior and evaluated using commonly employed stability criteria. Stability of response rate and pause was identified better by assessments that evaluated variability and trend, rather than just variability. Between-subject differences in rate of acquisition and terminal values of steady-state performance of pause were observed, and stable pause durations took longer to develop than did stable key-pecking rates. Relative variability in response rate and pause duration decreased as the means increased. A temporally organized pattern of key-pecking (the so-called FI scallop) developed within 50 sessions of exposure to the schedule. Overall ambulation decreased during the early sessions of exposure and further analyses showed greater rates of ambulation during the pause than after it for 4 of the 6 pigeons. Performance under the FI 3-min schedule developed relatively slowly, and key-pecking, pause, and ambulation developed at different rates.

摘要

六只鸽子在固定间隔(FI)3 分钟的食物呈现时间表下进行啄键。每只鸽子在 200 天的每日 15 个间隔的实验中(总共 3000 次食物呈现)进行研究。分析包括首次啄键(停顿)潜伏期、啄键平均率和走动的检查。通过评估变异和趋势而不仅仅是评估变异,对行为测量进行稳定性能的特征描述,并使用常用的稳定性标准进行评估。与仅评估变异的方法相比,评估波动和趋势的方法更能准确识别响应率和停顿的稳定性。在获得速度和停顿的稳定状态性能的最终值方面观察到了被试间的差异,并且稳定停顿时间的发展比稳定啄键率的发展要长。随着平均值的增加,响应率和停顿持续时间的相对变异性降低。在接触时间表的 50 次课程中,出现了啄键的时间组织模式(所谓的 FI 扇贝)。在接触的早期阶段,总体走动减少,进一步的分析表明,对于 6 只鸽子中的 4 只,在停顿期间的走动速度比停顿后快。FI 3 分钟时间表下的性能发展相对较慢,啄键、停顿和走动的发展速度不同。

相似文献

3
To peck or not peck: Which do pigeons prefer?啄还是不啄:鸽子更喜欢哪种?
Learn Behav. 2019 Sep;47(3):217-226. doi: 10.3758/s13420-018-0365-7.
7
An operant analog of food caching in the pigeon (Columba livia).鸽子(家鸽)食物贮藏行为的操作性模拟。
Learn Behav. 2022 Mar;50(1):82-88. doi: 10.3758/s13420-021-00477-2. Epub 2021 Jul 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Temporal control in fixed-interval schedules.固定时距程序中的时间控制。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Jan;61(1):1-9. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-1.
3
Temporal control of behavior: schedule interactions.行为的时间控制:时间表相互作用。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Nov;30(3):255-70. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.30-255.
5
Stability criteria.稳定性标准。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Jan;29(1):17-25. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-17.
8
Fixed-interval stimulus control.固定时距刺激控制。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Nov;14(3):291-9. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-291.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验