• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正常方向和镜像单词的匹配:优秀读者与阅读能力较差读者的表现对比

Matching of normally oriented and mirrored words by good and poor readers.

作者信息

Curtis D W, Elkins W

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 1977 Dec;45(3 Pt 2):1163-8. doi: 10.2466/pms.1977.45.3f.1163.

DOI:10.2466/pms.1977.45.3f.1163
PMID:604895
Abstract

10 good and 10 poor Grade 6 readers judged tachistoscopically presented word pairs to be "same" or "different" when the words making up the pairs were both normally oriented, both mirrored, or one was oriented and the other was mirrored. Good readers made fewer errors than poor readers on normally oriented "same" pairs but showed no advantage on other configurations. Poor readers were more accurate in detecting mismatches than good readers. These results were discussed in terms of the mechanism that may have been implicated.

摘要

10名阅读能力强的六年级学生和10名阅读能力弱的六年级学生,当通过速示器呈现的单词对中两个单词均为正常方向、均为镜像,或一个为正常方向而另一个为镜像时,判断这些单词对是“相同”还是“不同”。在正常方向的“相同”单词对上,阅读能力强的学生比阅读能力弱的学生出错更少,但在其他组合情况下没有优势。在检测不匹配方面,阅读能力弱的学生比阅读能力强的学生更准确。根据可能涉及的机制对这些结果进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
Matching of normally oriented and mirrored words by good and poor readers.正常方向和镜像单词的匹配:优秀读者与阅读能力较差读者的表现对比
Percept Mot Skills. 1977 Dec;45(3 Pt 2):1163-8. doi: 10.2466/pms.1977.45.3f.1163.
2
Is a "Phoenician" reading style superior to a "Chinese" reading style? Evidence from fourth graders.“腓尼基式”阅读风格比“中国式”阅读风格更优越吗?来自四年级学生的证据。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2008 Jul;100(3):186-214. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2007.10.005. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
3
Semantic and phonological coding in poor and normal readers.阅读能力较差者与正常阅读者的语义和语音编码
J Exp Child Psychol. 1995 Feb;59(1):76-123. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1995.1004.
4
Task-dependent modulation of neglect dyslexia? Novel evidence from the viewing position effect.忽视性阅读障碍的任务依赖型调制?来自观看位置效应的新证据。
Brain Res. 2008 Jan 16;1189:166-78. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.10.069. Epub 2007 Nov 12.
5
Differences in visuospatial judgement in reading-disabled and normal children.
Percept Mot Skills. 1996 Feb;82(1):155-77. doi: 10.2466/pms.1996.82.1.155.
6
Serial recall of poor readers in two presentation modalities: combined effects of phonological similarity and word length.两种呈现方式下阅读能力较差者的系列回忆:语音相似性和单词长度的综合影响。
J Exp Child Psychol. 1997 Jun;65(3):342-69. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1996.2361.
7
Spelling consistency affects reading in young Dutch readers with and without dyslexia.拼写一致性对有阅读障碍和无阅读障碍的荷兰年轻读者的阅读有影响。
Ann Dyslexia. 2006 Dec;56(2):271-300. doi: 10.1007/s11881-006-0012-4.
8
Picture-naming interference with good and poor readers.
Percept Mot Skills. 1979 Aug;49(1):67-70. doi: 10.2466/pms.1979.49.1.67.
9
Size does not matter, frequency does: sensitivity to orthographic neighbors in normal and dyslexic readers.大小无关紧要,频率才是关键:正常读者和阅读障碍读者对正字法相邻字符的敏感性。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2010 Jun-Jul;106(2-3):129-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.01.004. Epub 2010 Mar 16.
10
Mirrors are hard to break: A critical review and behavioral evidence on mirror-image processing in developmental dyslexia.镜像难以打破:关于发展性阅读障碍中镜像处理的批判性综述及行为证据
J Exp Child Psychol. 2017 Jul;159:66-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Mar 9.