Seidel M, Littman E, Schulze A, Schmieschek H G
Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz). 1977 Oct;29(10):598-605.
Comparative examinations of the paper and pencil form and a mechanical variation (using a performance testing unit) of Pauli's performance test, in which a total of 100 students were included, showed differences in the specific requirements of the two variants and in the performance rating of the test subjects. Consequently, their mutual substitution appears unjustifiable. It was not possible for effects of a number of situational test conditions upon performance results to be demonstrated for this test sample. Hypothesized relationships between the Pauli test performance, on the one hand, and proficiency motivation, attainments, and variational motivation, on the other, could be verified in part of the cases only.
对保利表现测试的纸笔形式和一种机械变体(使用性能测试单元)进行的对比测试,共纳入了100名学生,结果显示这两种变体在具体要求以及测试对象的表现评分方面存在差异。因此,将它们相互替代似乎是不合理的。对于这个测试样本,无法证明多种情境测试条件对表现结果的影响。关于保利测试表现一方面与熟练动机、成就以及变化动机另一方面之间的假设关系,仅在部分案例中得到了验证。