• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

给药频率对头孢噻肟治疗效果的影响。

Effect of frequency of administration on therapeutic efficacy of cefotaxime.

作者信息

Parker R H

出版信息

Clin Ther. 1984;6(4):488-99.

PMID:6088045
Abstract

Clinical trials with cefotaxime have demonstrated that this antibiotic is effective and safe in a wide range of dosage schedules. Because of uncertainty about the most appropriate dosage regimen, physicians may be inclined to prescribe cefotaxime in higher doses and greater frequencies of administration than are required or economical (eg, dosing every six hours for an infection caused by a highly susceptible microorganism). To demonstrate that cefotaxime offers the physician great flexibility in dosing to achieve successful treatment with optimal cost-effectiveness, efficacy data from comparative and noncomparative studies in the United States were analyzed. Cases reviewed were those in which both the initial and final dosage regimens corresponded to one of several predetermined dosing schedules. These schedules included doses of 0.5 to 2.0 gm administered from two to six times a day. Patients were categorized according to severity of infection, and clinical and bacteriological responses were summarized according to frequency of administration. The analysis yielded 2,096 clinically evaluable cases and 1,755 bacteriologically evaluable cases. Uniformly good clinical and bacteriological success rates were achieved in all dosage regimens, indicating that in many circumstances the most appropriate regimen is every eight hours or, for highly susceptible pathogens, every 12 hours. Giving cefotaxime every six hours or more often is justified only when high concentrations of antibiotic are needed at the site of infection. Prescribing cefotaxime in the most appropriate dosage regimen will have a significant impact on the cost-effectiveness of antimicrobial therapy.

摘要

头孢噻肟的临床试验表明,这种抗生素在广泛的给药方案中都是有效且安全的。由于最适宜的给药方案尚不确定,医生可能倾向于开出比所需剂量更高、给药频率更高的头孢噻肟处方,而这些剂量既无必要,也不经济(例如,对于由高度敏感微生物引起的感染,每六小时给药一次)。为了证明头孢噻肟能为医生提供很大的给药灵活性,以实现成本效益最佳的成功治疗,我们分析了美国比较性和非比较性研究中的疗效数据。所审查的病例是初始和最终给药方案均符合几种预定给药方案之一的病例。这些方案包括每天给药2至6次,每次剂量为0.5至2.0克。根据感染的严重程度对患者进行分类,并根据给药频率总结临床和细菌学反应。分析得出2096例可进行临床评估的病例和1755例可进行细菌学评估的病例。所有给药方案均取得了一致良好的临床和细菌学成功率,这表明在许多情况下,最合适的给药方案是每八小时一次,或者对于高度敏感的病原体,每12小时一次。仅当感染部位需要高浓度抗生素时,才需要每六小时或更频繁地给予头孢噻肟。采用最合适的给药方案开具头孢噻肟将对抗菌治疗的成本效益产生重大影响。

相似文献

1
Effect of frequency of administration on therapeutic efficacy of cefotaxime.给药频率对头孢噻肟治疗效果的影响。
Clin Ther. 1984;6(4):488-99.
2
Limiting cefotaxime pediatric dosing to adult standards: a pharmacokinetic simulation study.将头孢噻肟儿科给药剂量限制在成人标准:一项药代动力学模拟研究。
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999 Jun;37(6):269-74.
3
Cefotaxime vs nafcillin and tobramycin for the treatment of serious infection. Comparative cost-effectiveness.头孢噻肟与萘夫西林及妥布霉素治疗严重感染的比较。成本效益对比
Arch Intern Med. 1986 Jun;146(6):1153-7.
4
In nosocomial pneumonia, optimizing antibiotics other than aminoglycosides is a more important determinant of successful clinical outcome, and a better means of avoiding resistance.在医院获得性肺炎中,优化除氨基糖苷类以外的抗生素是临床成功结局更重要的决定因素,也是避免耐药性的更好方法。
Semin Respir Infect. 1997 Dec;12(4):278-93.
5
Carbapenems: monotherapy in intra-abdominal sepsis.碳青霉烯类药物:用于腹腔内脓毒症的单一疗法。
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1995;96:28-33.
6
Efficacy of ceftizoxime administered twice daily in hospitalized patients with respiratory tract infections.
Clin Ther. 1984;7(1):33-9.
7
Two different dosages of cefotaxime in the treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis: results of a prospective, randomized, multicenter study.两种不同剂量头孢噻肟治疗肝硬化自发性细菌性腹膜炎:一项前瞻性、随机、多中心研究结果
Hepatology. 1995 Mar;21(3):674-9.
8
[Development of antituberculous drugs: current status and future prospects].[抗结核药物的研发:现状与未来前景]
Kekkaku. 2006 Dec;81(12):753-74.
9
Review and reassessment of dosing schedules for cefotaxime in selected medical indications.对选定医学适应症中头孢噻肟给药方案的回顾与重新评估。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995 May-Jun;22(1-2):147-54. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(95)00103-h.
10
Treatment of relapsed aggressive lymphomas: regimens with and without high-dose therapy and stem cell rescue.复发侵袭性淋巴瘤的治疗:含与不含高剂量治疗及干细胞救援的方案
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2002 May;49 Suppl 1:S13-20. doi: 10.1007/s00280-002-0447-1. Epub 2002 Apr 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Cefotaxime optimal dosage in adult patients. A reappraisal.
Drugs. 1988;35 Suppl 2:221-30. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198800352-00049.
2
Clinical experience with cefotaxime in internal medicine between 1981 and 1984.1981年至1984年间头孢噻肟在内科的临床应用经验。
Drugs. 1988;35 Suppl 2:190-4. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198800352-00040.
3
Cefotaxime. An update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use.头孢噻肟。其药理学与治疗应用的最新进展。
Drugs. 1990 Oct;40(4):608-51. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199040040-00008.