• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢噻肟与萘夫西林及妥布霉素治疗严重感染的比较。成本效益对比

Cefotaxime vs nafcillin and tobramycin for the treatment of serious infection. Comparative cost-effectiveness.

作者信息

Moore R D, Smith C R, Holloway J J, Lietman P S

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 1986 Jun;146(6):1153-7.

PMID:3087307
Abstract

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of cefotaxime sodium at a dosage of 12 g/day vs nafcillin sodium and tobramycin sulfate for the treatment of serious infection, the hospital and physician charges of patients enrolled in a prospective, randomized, clinical trial were analyzed. For 187 patients receiving therapy empirically, mean hospital charges for the interval in which the trial antibiotics were used were $3,550 +/- $1,740 for cefotaxime and $3,160 +/- $1,990 for nafcillin and tobramycin. After adjusting for cost-generating factors, charges for cefotaxime were greater than for nafcillin and tobramycin, but the difference was not significant. For 107 patients with clinically or bacteriologically documented infection, mean charges were $3,980 +/- $1,800 for cefotaxime and $4,170 +/- $1,780 for nafcillin and tobramycin. Adjusted charges did not differ. Incremental charges for cefotaxime per additional response were $1,630 in all patients and -$820 in patients with clinically or bacteriologically documented infections.

摘要

为评估每日剂量12克的头孢噻肟钠与萘夫西林钠和硫酸妥布霉素相比治疗严重感染的成本效益,对参与一项前瞻性、随机临床试验的患者的医院费用和医生收费进行了分析。对于187例经验性接受治疗的患者,使用试验性抗生素期间的平均医院收费,头孢噻肟为3550美元±1740美元,萘夫西林和妥布霉素为3160美元±1990美元。在对成本产生因素进行调整后,头孢噻肟的收费高于萘夫西林和妥布霉素,但差异不显著。对于107例临床或细菌学确诊感染的患者,头孢噻肟的平均收费为3980美元±1800美元,萘夫西林和妥布霉素为4170美元±1780美元。调整后的收费无差异。所有患者中,头孢噻肟每增加一个有效反应的增量收费为1630美元,临床或细菌学确诊感染的患者为 -820美元。

相似文献

1
Cefotaxime vs nafcillin and tobramycin for the treatment of serious infection. Comparative cost-effectiveness.头孢噻肟与萘夫西林及妥布霉素治疗严重感染的比较。成本效益对比
Arch Intern Med. 1986 Jun;146(6):1153-7.
2
Cefotaxime compared with nafcillin plus tobramycin for serious bacterial infections. A randomized, double-blind trial.头孢噻肟与萘夫西林加妥布霉素治疗严重细菌感染的比较。一项随机双盲试验。
Ann Intern Med. 1984 Oct;101(4):469-77. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-101-4-469.
3
Cefotaxime and nafcillin-tobramycin.头孢噻肟与萘夫西林-妥布霉素
Ann Intern Med. 1985 Feb;102(2):275-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-102-2-275_3.
4
Prospective double-blind controlled clinical study of sisomicin versus tobramycin.西索米星与妥布霉素的前瞻性双盲对照临床研究
Pharmatherapeutica. 1981;2(8):499-503.
5
Comparative evaluation of netilmicin-ticarcillin and tobramycin-ticarcillin in the treatment of serious systemic infections in elderly patients.奈替米星-替卡西林与妥布霉素-替卡西林治疗老年患者严重全身感染的比较评价
Clin Ther. 1984;7(1):112-20.
6
Increased risk of renal dysfunction due to interaction of liver disease and aminoglycosides.
Am J Med. 1986 Jun;80(6):1093-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(86)90670-4.
7
Effect of frequency of administration on therapeutic efficacy of cefotaxime.给药频率对头孢噻肟治疗效果的影响。
Clin Ther. 1984;6(4):488-99.
8
Comparative cost effectiveness of gentamicin and tobramycin.庆大霉素与妥布霉素的成本效益比较
Ann Intern Med. 1984 Dec;101(6):764-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-101-6-764.
9
Antibiotics in infections of the biliary tract.抗生素在胆道感染中的应用
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1987 Oct;165(4):285-92.
10
Systemic treatment of cutaneous infections. A comparative study of ciprofloxacin and cefotaxime.皮肤感染的全身治疗。环丙沙星与头孢噻肟的比较研究。
Am J Med. 1987 Apr 27;82(4A):227-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Beta lactam antibiotic monotherapy versus beta lactam-aminoglycoside antibiotic combination therapy for sepsis.β-内酰胺类抗生素单药治疗与β-内酰胺类-氨基糖苷类抗生素联合治疗败血症的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 7;2014(1):CD003344. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003344.pub3.
2
Economic analysis of fluconazole versus amphotericin B for the treatment of candidemia in non-neutropenic patients.氟康唑与两性霉素B治疗非中性粒细胞减少患者念珠菌血症的经济学分析
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 May;13(5 Pt 1):509-18. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199813050-00004.
3
Cost analysis of imipenem-cilastatin versus clindamycin with tobramycin in the treatment of acute intra-abdominal infection.
亚胺培南-西司他丁与克林霉素联合妥布霉素治疗急性腹腔内感染的成本分析
Pharmacoeconomics. 1993 Sep;4(3):203-14. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199304030-00005.