Suppr超能文献

犬在传统、新型及开胸心肺复苏过程中的脑血流量

Cerebral blood flow during conventional, new and open-chest cardio-pulmonary resuscitation in dogs.

作者信息

Arai T, Dote K, Tsukahara I, Nitta K, Nagaro T

出版信息

Resuscitation. 1984 Jul;12(2):147-54. doi: 10.1016/0300-9572(84)90066-2.

Abstract

The following parameters were monitored simultaneously in 15 dogs, in order to evaluate the efficacy of conventional CPR (C-CPR), new CPR (N-CPR), and open-chest CPR (O-CPR) on cerebral perfusion: arterial blood pressure (BP), central venous pressure (CVP), intrathoracic airway pressure, blood flow in carotid artery, intracranial pressure (ICP), sagittal sinus blood flow (sinus BF) and pressure (sinus P), and blood flow in cerebral cortex (cortical BF). The sinus blood flow was measured by the direct-method and with a cannulating electromagnetic flowmeter. The cortical blood flow was measured with a termocouple tissue flowmeter. Intracranial pressure was obtained by measuring subarachnoid cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Ventricular fibrillation was induced electrically. Chest compression and ventilation were always done manually in all cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The mean blood pressures during C-CPR, N-CPR and O-CPR were 52, 68 and 95 mmHg, respectively, and mean carotid blood flows per stroke were 36, 71 and 131% of the control values, respectively. The intracranial pressures were 30, 42 and 36 mmHg, respectively, giving the calculated cerebral perfusion pressures (BP-ICP) of 22, 27 and 60 mmHg, respectively. This should have been reflected in cerebral blood flow. Sinus blood flows/min were 18, 18 and 42%, and sinus blood flows per stroke were 55, 45 and 127% of control values, respectively; the differences between C-CPR and N-CPR were not significant. This was also true for cortical blood flow. From this we conclude that, firstly, N-CPR is not significantly better than C-CPR in cerebral perfusion because of its accompanying high intracranial pressure, secondly, O-CPR is far superior to the other two methods in respect of cerebral perfusion.

摘要

为评估传统心肺复苏(C-CPR)、新型心肺复苏(N-CPR)和开胸心肺复苏(O-CPR)对脑灌注的效果,同时对15只犬的以下参数进行了监测:动脉血压(BP)、中心静脉压(CVP)、胸内气道压力、颈动脉血流、颅内压(ICP)、矢状窦血流(窦BF)和压力(窦P)以及大脑皮质血流(皮质BF)。窦血流通过直接法和插管式电磁流量计进行测量。皮质血流用热电偶组织流量计进行测量。颅内压通过测量蛛网膜下腔脑脊液压力获得。通过电刺激诱发心室颤动。在所有心肺复苏过程中,胸外按压和通气均始终采用手动方式。C-CPR、N-CPR和O-CPR期间的平均血压分别为52、68和95 mmHg,每次按压的平均颈动脉血流分别为对照值的36%、71%和131%。颅内压分别为30、42和36 mmHg,由此计算出的脑灌注压(BP-ICP)分别为22、27和60 mmHg。这应该反映在脑血流中。窦血流每分钟分别为对照值的18%、18%和42%,每次按压的窦血流分别为对照值的55%、45%和127%;C-CPR和N-CPR之间的差异不显著。皮质血流情况也是如此。由此我们得出结论,首先,N-CPR在脑灌注方面并不显著优于C-CPR,因为其伴随较高的颅内压;其次,O-CPR在脑灌注方面远优于其他两种方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验