Fedail S S, Badi S E, Musa A R
Am J Clin Nutr. 1984 Oct;40(4):776-9. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/40.4.776.
The effects of sorghum and wheat bran were compared and contrasted in a group of healthy Sudanese subjects. Ten medical students were studied while taking their normal diet, a diet of 20 g/day of sorghum bran and a diet of 20 g/day of wheat bran, each for 3 wk. Toward the end of each dietary period the wet stool weight, gut transit time, and frequency of bowel evacuation were estimated. The mean stool weight on normal diet was 136.6 +/- 43.1 g/day, on sorghum bran 173.3 +/- 48.4 g/day, and on wheat bran 219.1 +/- 98.3 g/day. The increase produced by wheat bran was significant, p less than 0.001. Both brans produced a similar number of bowel evacuations. The results suggest that sorghum bran, which is both cheap and readily available in the Sudan, produces a similar number of bowel evacuations to those of wheat bran without significantly affecting stool weight or transit time.
在一组健康的苏丹受试者中对高粱麸和麦麸的效果进行了比较和对比。对10名医科学生在其正常饮食、每天20克高粱麸饮食和每天20克麦麸饮食的情况下进行了研究,每种饮食持续3周。在每个饮食阶段结束时,估计湿粪便重量、肠道运输时间和排便频率。正常饮食时的平均粪便重量为136.6±43.1克/天,高粱麸饮食时为173.3±48.4克/天,麦麸饮食时为219.1±98.3克/天。麦麸导致的增加具有显著性,p<0.001。两种麸皮产生的排便次数相似。结果表明,在苏丹既便宜又容易获得的高粱麸,产生的排便次数与麦麸相似,且对粪便重量或运输时间没有显著影响。