• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢曲松门诊使用:成本效益分析。

Outpatient use of ceftriaxone: a cost-benefit analysis.

作者信息

Poretz D M, Woolard D, Eron L J, Goldenberg R I, Rising J, Sparks S

出版信息

Am J Med. 1984 Oct 19;77(4C):77-83.

PMID:6093525
Abstract

Patients who participated in an outpatient intravenous therapy program designed to limit hospitalization for those who could be maintained on ceftriaxone at home were interviewed regarding costs and benefits. Of the 79 patients interviewed concerning 83 therapeutic episodes, 43.4 percent were able to perform their usual activities as soon as they began the program, 28.9 percent were restricted for part of the time, and 27.7 percent never resumed their usual activities. The 83 therapeutic episodes represent a total of 2,409 outpatient days (mean 29.7; standard deviation [SD] 17.7), 1,406 of which represent unrestricted activities. Costs and benefits of the program were calculated separately for four employment groups: not employed; usually employed, but not while on intravenous therapy; employed while on intravenous therapy, with time off for follow-up visits; and employed while on intravenous therapy, no time off for follow-up required. The mean total benefit, weighted across all four groups, was $6,588.14 (SD = $3,802.90) per patient. Mean weighted costs totalled $1,768.02 (SD = $1,129.36). The overall weighted benefit/cost ratio was approximately 5:1. Although private insurers reimbursed 63 percent of the patients for all hospitalization costs, only 39 percent were fully covered for the follow-up physician visits required during outpatient therapy.

摘要

参与门诊静脉治疗项目的患者接受了关于成本和效益的访谈。该项目旨在减少那些在家中接受头孢曲松治疗即可维持病情的患者的住院次数。在接受访谈的79名患者中,共涉及83个治疗疗程。其中,43.4%的患者在开始治疗后能够立即恢复日常活动,28.9%的患者在部分时间内受到限制,27.7%的患者从未恢复日常活动。这83个治疗疗程共计2409个门诊日(平均29.7天;标准差[SD]17.7天),其中1406个门诊日代表不受限制的活动。该项目的成本和效益针对四个就业群体分别进行了计算:未就业;通常就业,但在接受静脉治疗期间不工作;在接受静脉治疗期间工作,但需请假进行随访;在接受静脉治疗期间工作,无需请假进行随访。所有四个群体的加权平均总效益为每位患者6588.14美元(标准差 = 3802.90美元)。加权平均成本总计1768.02美元(标准差 = 1129.36美元)。总体加权效益/成本比约为5:1。尽管私人保险公司为63%的患者报销了所有住院费用,但只有39%的患者在门诊治疗期间所需的随访医生就诊费用得到了全额覆盖。

相似文献

1
Outpatient use of ceftriaxone: a cost-benefit analysis.头孢曲松门诊使用:成本效益分析。
Am J Med. 1984 Oct 19;77(4C):77-83.
2
Combined ceftriaxone and surgical therapy for osteomyelitis in hospital and outpatient settings.头孢曲松联合手术治疗医院及门诊环境下的骨髓炎
Am J Surg. 1984 Oct 19;148(4A):1-4.
3
Treatment of urinary tract infections among febrile young children with daily intravenous antibiotic therapy at a day treatment center.在日间治疗中心对发热幼儿的尿路感染采用每日静脉注射抗生素疗法进行治疗。
Pediatrics. 2004 Oct;114(4):e469-76. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0421.
4
Single daily dose treatment of severe refractory infections with ceftriaxone. Cost savings and possible parenteral outpatient treatment.每日单次剂量使用头孢曲松治疗严重难治性感染。节省成本及可能的门诊胃肠外治疗。
Arch Intern Med. 1983 Oct;143(10):1868-73.
5
Early hospital discharge versus continued hospitalization in febrile pediatric cancer patients with prolonged neutropenia: A randomized, prospective study.发热性长期中性粒细胞减少的儿科癌症患者早期出院与继续住院治疗的比较:一项随机前瞻性研究。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007 Nov;49(6):786-92. doi: 10.1002/pbc.21179.
6
Cost of home and hospital care for patients with cystic fibrosis followed up in two reference medical centers in France.在法国两个参考医疗中心对囊性纤维化患者进行家庭和医院护理的费用。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006 Fall;22(4):525-31. doi: 10.1017/S0266462306051476.
7
[Bottom-up analysis of the case costs of stem cell transplantation and selected chemotherapies].[干细胞移植及特定化疗病例成本的自下而上分析]
Klin Padiatr. 2003 May-Jun;215(3):179-84. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-39379.
8
Ambulatory care visits to physician offices, hospital outpatient departments, and emergency departments: United States, 1996.1996年美国内科医生诊所、医院门诊部及急诊科的门诊护理就诊情况
Vital Health Stat 13. 1998 Feb(134):1-37.
9
Ambulatory care visits to physician offices, hospital outpatient departments, and emergency departments: United States, 1997.1997年美国门诊医疗机构(包括医生办公室、医院门诊部和急诊科)的门诊就诊情况。
Vital Health Stat 13. 1999 Nov(143):i-iv, 1-39.
10
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2001 summary.国家门诊医疗护理调查:2001年总结
Adv Data. 2003 Aug 11(337):1-44.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of Ceftriaxone and Benzylpenicillin in Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy: Spectrum vs Cost.头孢曲松和苄星青霉素在门诊胃肠外抗菌治疗中的应用:抗菌谱与成本比较
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Oct 6;10(11):ofad505. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad505. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
Palliative outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy: a review of 5 years of patient data.姑息性门诊胃肠外抗生素治疗:5年患者数据回顾
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2020 Aug 6;2(3):dlaa052. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlaa052. eCollection 2020 Sep.
3
Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy practices among adult infectious disease physicians.
成年传染病医生的门诊胃肠外抗菌治疗实践
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014 Jul;35(7):839-44. doi: 10.1086/676859. Epub 2014 May 9.
4
Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy with ceftriaxone, a review.头孢曲松的门诊患者的肠外抗菌治疗:综述。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2012 Jun;34(3):410-7. doi: 10.1007/s11096-012-9637-z. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
5
Pyelonephritis in pregnancy: treatment options for optimal outcomes.妊娠期肾盂肾炎:实现最佳治疗效果的治疗选择
Drugs. 2001;61(14):2087-96. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200161140-00006.
6
Incremental cost analysis of ambulatory clinic and home-based intravenous therapy for patients with multiple myeloma.多发性骨髓瘤患者门诊诊所治疗与家庭静脉治疗的增量成本分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19(8):845-54. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119080-00006.
7
Place of parenteral cephalosporins in the ambulatory setting: clinical evidence.胃肠外头孢菌素在门诊环境中的应用:临床证据
Drugs. 2000;59 Suppl 3:37-46; discussion 47-9. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200059003-00005.
8
Pharmacoeconomic considerations in the ambulatory use of parenteral cephalosporins.门诊使用胃肠外头孢菌素的药物经济学考量
Drugs. 2000;59 Suppl 3:29-35; discussion 47-9. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200059003-00004.
9
Parenteral cephalosporin therapy in ambulatory care: advantages and disadvantages.门诊护理中的胃肠外头孢菌素治疗:利弊
Drugs. 2000;59 Suppl 3:19-28; discussion 47-9. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200059003-00003.
10
Ambulatory use of parenteral antibacterials: contemporary perspectives.肠外抗菌药物的门诊使用:当代观点
Drugs. 2000;59 Suppl 3:1-8; discussion 47-9. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200059003-00001.