Lennie P
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1980 Jul 8;290(1038):23-37. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1980.0080.
Previous physiological work has shown that the X and Y cells found in the visual pathways of cats and monkeys have properties that might explain the perceptual distinction between 'sustained' and 'transient' mechanisms. However, when the sensitivities of X and Y cells are measured under conditions comparable with those used in psychophysical experiments, one finds that the properties thought to be relevant to the perceptual dichotomy do not in fact distinguish the two types of cell. One of the most important psychophysical grounds for distinguishing 'sustained' from 'transient' mechanisms is that there appear to be two distinct thresholds for detecting grating patterns, depending upon whether the observer is asked to detect the spatial or the temporal properties of the stimulus. However, if threshold are measured under conditions where the observer's criterion is tigahtly controlled, the two thresholds converge. These experiments question the existence of qualitatively distinct 'sustained' and 'trasient' mechanisms.
以往的生理学研究表明,在猫和猴子的视觉通路中发现的X细胞和Y细胞具有一些特性,这些特性可能解释了“持续”和“瞬态”机制之间的感知差异。然而,当在与心理物理学实验中使用的条件相当的情况下测量X细胞和Y细胞的敏感性时,人们发现,那些被认为与感知二分法相关的特性实际上并不能区分这两种类型的细胞。区分“持续”机制和“瞬态”机制的最重要的心理物理学依据之一是,检测光栅图案似乎存在两个不同的阈值,这取决于观察者是被要求检测刺激的空间特性还是时间特性。然而,如果在观察者的标准被严格控制的条件下测量阈值,这两个阈值会趋于一致。这些实验对定性不同的“持续”和“瞬态”机制的存在提出了质疑。