Suppr超能文献

Influence of blood sampling methods on dopamine-receptor-blocking activities as determined by a radioreceptor assay.

作者信息

Lai A A, Fleck R J, Patzke J V, Glueck B G, Shaskan E G, Rosenberg B J

出版信息

Ther Drug Monit. 1982;4(1):89-93. doi: 10.1097/00007691-198204000-00013.

Abstract

The influence of blood collection methods on dopamine-receptor-blocking activities as determined by a radioreceptor assay kit was investigated. Thirty-one patients treated with one of six neuroleptic drugs (thioridazine, trifluoperazine, haloperidol, chlorpromazine, thiothixene, or fluphenazine) participated in this study. Blood samples were drawn from each patient into five different evacuated blood collection tubes made by the same manufacturer (red-stoppered tube containing no additives, lavender-stoppered tube containing EDTA, green-stoppered tube containing heparin, dark blue-stoppered tube containing no additives, and dark blue-stoppered tube containing heparin). The results show that for five drugs (chlorpromazine, fluphenazine, haloperidol, thiothixene, and trifluoperazine), the dark blue-stoppered tubes without additives resulted in significantly higher dopamine-receptor-blocking activities than the red-, lavender-, or green-stoppered tubes. For thioridazine, the green-stoppered tubes resulted in significantly higher blocking activities than the blue- and red-stoppered tubes. The possible effect of tris(2-butoxyethyl) phosphate, a plasticizer, on dopamine-receptor-blocking activities by neuroleptic drugs is discussed.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验