Svensson C K, Woodruff M N, Baxter J G, Lalka D
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1986 Nov-Dec;11(6):450-69. doi: 10.2165/00003088-198611060-00003.
Recent advances in techniques to determine free drug concentrations have lead to a substantial increase in the monitoring of this parameter in clinical practice. The majority of drug binding to macromolecules in serum can be accounted for by association with albumin and alpha 1-acid glycoprotein. Albumin is the primary binding protein for acidic drugs, while binding to alpha 1-acid glycoprotein is more commonly observed with basic lipophilic agents. Alterations in the concentrations of either of these macromolecules can result in significant changes in free fraction. Diseases such as cirrhosis, nephrotic syndrome and malnourishment can result in hypoalbuminaemia. Burn injury, cancer, chronic pain syndrome, myocardial infarction, inflammatory diseases and trauma are all associated with elevations in the concentration of alpha 1-acid glycoprotein. Treatment with a number of drugs has also been shown to increase alpha 1-acid glycoprotein serum concentrations. A wide variety of biological fluids have been examined for their ability to provide an estimation of free drug concentration at receptor sites. The most useful fluid for estimating free drug concentrations appears to be plasma or serum, with subsequent treatment of the sample to separate free and bound drug by an appropriate technique. The two most widely used methods are equilibrium dialysis and ultrafiltration. Of these two, ultrafiltration has the greatest utility clinically because it is rapid and relatively simple. The major difficulty associated with this method involves the binding of drug to the ultrafilters, but significant progress has been made in solving this problem. Several authors have endorsed the routine use of free drug concentration monitoring. Data examining the clinical usefulness of free drug concentration monitoring for phenytoin, carbamazepine, valproic acid, disopyramide and lignocaine (lidocaine) are reviewed. While available evidence suggests that free concentrations may correlate with clinical effects better than total drug concentrations, there are insufficient data to justify the recommendation of the routine use of free drug concentration monitoring for any of these agents at present.
测定游离药物浓度技术的最新进展已使临床实践中对该参数的监测大幅增加。血清中大多数与大分子结合的药物可归因于与白蛋白和α1-酸性糖蛋白的结合。白蛋白是酸性药物的主要结合蛋白,而碱性亲脂性药物更常观察到与α1-酸性糖蛋白结合。这些大分子中任何一种浓度的改变都可能导致游离分数的显著变化。肝硬化、肾病综合征和营养不良等疾病可导致低白蛋白血症。烧伤、癌症、慢性疼痛综合征、心肌梗死、炎症性疾病和创伤都与α1-酸性糖蛋白浓度升高有关。使用多种药物治疗也已显示可增加α1-酸性糖蛋白的血清浓度。已对多种生物体液评估其在受体部位提供游离药物浓度估计值的能力。用于估计游离药物浓度最有用的体液似乎是血浆或血清,随后通过适当技术处理样品以分离游离和结合药物。两种最广泛使用的方法是平衡透析和超滤。在这两种方法中,超滤在临床上实用性最大,因为它快速且相对简单。与该方法相关的主要困难涉及药物与超滤器的结合,但在解决这个问题方面已取得重大进展。几位作者认可常规使用游离药物浓度监测。本文综述了关于苯妥英、卡马西平、丙戊酸、双异丙吡胺和利多卡因游离药物浓度监测临床实用性的数据。虽然现有证据表明游离浓度可能比总药物浓度与临床效果的相关性更好,但目前尚无足够数据证明对这些药物中的任何一种常规使用游离药物浓度监测是合理的。