Guaragna R F, Capucci A, Sangiorgio P, Bracchetti D
G Ital Cardiol. 1982;12(4):284-91.
In 10 patients with ventricular preexcitation (Kent bundle), in whom atrial fibrillation (A.F.) was present, the effect of some common antiarrhythmic drugs on the conduction through the anomalous pathway, and on the ventricular rate was estimated. Procainamide caused transient complete block in the accessory pathway (disappearance of the aberrant QRS) and marked reduction of the average ventricular rate in all instances. Lidocaine caused incomplete block in the accessory pathway (reduction of the number of the aberrant QRS) and significant reduction of the average ventricular rate in all tested subjects. Amiodarone slowed the ventricular rate (increase of the average and minimum R-R intervals between wide QRS complexes) in two patients, but it did not block the anomalous pathway (all QRS complexes remained aberrant); whereas in 1 patient the ventricular rate became faster and regular and the patient had syncope, while the QRS remained always aberrant. This response was probably due to the change of A.F. into atrial flutter with atrio-ventricular conduction through the anomalous pathway only. Digitalis increased the average ventricular rate and shortened the minimum R-R interval between aberrant QRS complexes 3 out of 3 times. On the basis of our experience and of the data in the literature, we conclude that, in the management of A.F. in patients with W.P.W. syndrome:--the most effective drugs are those of the 1st group of Singh and Hauswirth classification (especially Procainamide and Ajmaline);--Lidocaine is less effective, but not ineffective and its utilization may be recommended whenever the previous drugs may be hazardous;--Amiodarone, although capable of modifying the electrophysiologic properties both of the anomalous pathway and of the A-V node, seems to be less reliable;--the drugs which influence only the A-V node (Verapamil, beta-Blockers, etc.) are quite ineffective;--finally, the Digitalis is not suitable because this drug increases the ventricular rate by decreasing the effective refractory period (ERP) of the anomalous pathway.
在10例存在心室预激(肯特束)且伴有心房颤动(房颤)的患者中,评估了一些常用抗心律失常药物对经异常途径传导及心室率的影响。普鲁卡因胺在所有病例中均导致旁路的短暂完全性阻滞(异常QRS波消失),并使平均心室率显著降低。利多卡因导致旁路不完全性阻滞(异常QRS波数量减少),且在所有受试对象中使平均心室率显著降低。胺碘酮使2例患者的心室率减慢(宽QRS波群之间平均及最短R-R间期延长),但未阻滞异常途径(所有QRS波群仍为异常);而在1例患者中,心室率加快且变得规则,该患者发生晕厥,同时QRS波群始终异常。这种反应可能仅因房颤转变为通过异常途径进行房室传导的心房扑动所致。洋地黄在3次试验中有3次均使平均心室率增加,并缩短了异常QRS波群之间的最短R-R间期。根据我们的经验及文献资料,我们得出结论,在预激综合征患者房颤的治疗中:——最有效的药物是辛格和豪斯维思分类中的第1组药物(尤其是普鲁卡因胺和阿义马林);——利多卡因效果较差,但并非无效,当先前使用的药物可能有危险时可推荐使用;——胺碘酮虽然能够改变异常途径及房室结的电生理特性,但似乎不太可靠;——仅影响房室结的药物(维拉帕米、β受体阻滞剂等)完全无效;——最后,洋地黄不合适,因为该药物通过缩短异常途径的有效不应期来增加心室率。